City
Epaper

AG for live streaming cases, virtual hearings post-pandemic too

By IANS | Updated: November 26, 2020 21:25 IST

New Delhi, Nov 26 Attorney General K.K. Venugopal on Thursday batted for live streaming of court cases and ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Nov 26 Attorney General K.K. Venugopal on Thursday batted for live streaming of court cases and video conferencing as a norm in future for functioning of courts, which should not stop even after the pandemic is over.

In his address at the Constitution Day celebrations organised by the Supreme Court, he said a crisis has developed due to Covid-19, which has impacted the normal functioning of three organs of the state.

"But the justice delivery system has not allowed itself to be beaten by this pandemic, rather swiftly adapted, in order to ensure doors of justice remains open for the country.

"I've been watching the Supreme Court of England & Wales - they have been also having virtual hearings. When we have live streaming, the whole world can watch the hearings. every single subordinate court and all High Courts may have live streamlining and video conferencing... this should not be stopped even after the pandemic is over; we should have it as a norm," the AG said.

Venugopal said the Supreme Court has a superb record in taking up matters through video conferencing since the beginning of the lockdown. He added that the Gujarat High Court has also innovated as they started livestreaming the arguments in virtual hearing, and appreciated the decorum of lawyers who participated in these hearings.

As measure to address growing pendency, the AG, noting that today the top court is dealing with 400 categories of cases spanning rent control, matrimonial, land acquisition among others which the apex court of other countries do not touch, he opined that the Supreme Court can start as a clean slate and restrict itself to constitutional matters and important national cases, and the rest can be handled by intermediate courts of appeal.

This doesn't mean that cases end at High Court, but there can be intermediate courts of appeal, he clarified.

The AG suggested four intermediate courts of appeal with 15 judges each in the four corners of the country to ensure access to justice.

"If we have to wait for 20 years or 30 years to get justice, then it is the lower middle class which are the ones affected. The corporates don't face issues (in the current system), they can very well afford to wait," he said.

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

LifestyleHow to Avoid Sleepiness After Eating: Diet & Lifestyle Tips You Must Follow

NationalSIR 'fear': Woman sets herself afire in Kolkata, dies

BusinessNORI Launches Next-Generation Travel Gear – Where Style Meets Real-World Function

CricketCricket's biggest names gather ahead of the 2025 Abu Dhabi T10 season opener

BusinessPhysics Wallah Listing: Edtech Firm Shares List at 33% Premium Over IPO Price

National Realted Stories

NationalGen Z is angry, they will come out and express their ire: Robert Vadra on MGB’s rout in Bihar polls

NationalSeven members of a Rajasthan family get lifer in 2014 Bhanwarnath murder case

NationalWhy ISI's Kashmir revival faltered: Money driven terrorists failed, but professional cells are filling the gap

NationalAndhra Pradesh Tragedy: Man Tries to Overtake Lorry, Gets Crushed Under Wheels; Disturbing Footage Surfaced

NationalTN ration shop staff struggle with 'inadequate' funds for essential commodities' deliveries