City
Epaper

Are they getting food? They must get food: SC on migrants amid exodus

By IANS | Updated: May 28, 2020 15:25 IST

As the Centre on Thursday told the Supreme Court that around 91 lakh migrant workers have been transported to ...

Open in App

As the Centre on Thursday told the Supreme Court that around 91 lakh migrant workers have been transported to their home states in coordination with the state governments on board the Shramik Special trains and road transports between May 1-27, the top court queried whether the vast human population of workers on their journey were being fed properly.

The top court asked the Centre's counsel, "Are they asked to pay for tickets at any stage...the concern is how is the state government paying? Are the workers being asked to shell out money?"

The top court also queried, are these people being reimbursed later? And, are they getting food as they wait for trains to be transported? "They must get food," insisted the top court. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta replied they are being provided food.

Mehta, representing the Centre, said nearly 3.36 lakh migrants were moved every day, and insisted that the government would not stop its efforts till the last migrant was sent back to his/her home state.

A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, S.K. Kaul and M.R. Shah said no doubt Centre and state governments have taken steps, but there are many deserving persons who could not avail the benefits meant for them.

The observations from the top court came during a hearing on the matter connected with the plight of migrant workers, where it took suo moto cognizance.

The apex court told the Centre to ensure migrants on the move get food, water and basic amenities before they reach home. Uttar Pradesh and Bihar account for 80 per cent migrants, Mehta informed the top court.

The apex court noted that in relief camps migrants may be getting food, but those in rented premises are suffering due to the lockdown.

On Tuesday, the top court had said there have been inadequacies and lapses on part of both central and the state governments, and sought response from Centre and state governments.

Mehta contended before the bench that concerned authorities are also properly screening at boarding and alighting points for the migrant workers, as a measure to ensure Covid-19 is not spread in rural areas.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Supreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

Maharashtra"Local Body Elections Long Overdue, We Are Fully Prepared", Sanjay Raut on SC Order

MaharashtraMaharashtra Local Body Polls 2025: Supreme Court Asks State Commission to Conduct Elections Within 4 Months

EntertainmentSamay Raina and Four Others Summoned by Supreme Court Over Mocking Disabled Individuals

NationalSC Rejects Red Fort Claim by Woman Posing as Mughal Heir: ‘Why Not Fatehpur Sikri Too?’

National Realted Stories

NationalAmritsar district admin resumes blackout in civil defence drill, asks people not to panic

NationalMock drill conducted in Sikkim's Gangtok

NationalDrone recovered along India-Bangladesh border in Assam, probe on

NationalUGC Issues Clarification on Fake Notice About Exam Cancellations After Operation Sindoor

NationalOdisha Cabinet approves eight key proposals