City
Epaper

Ayodhya title dispute should be settled in favour of Lord Ram temple: Prince Yakub

By ANI | Updated: November 8, 2019 15:00 IST

Prince Yakub Habeebuddin Tucy, who claims to be a descendant of last Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar, on Friday said that the title should be settled in favour of Lord Ram temple in the Ayodhya land dispute case.

Open in App

Prince Yakub Habeebuddin Tucy, who claims to be a descendant of last Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar, on Friday said that the title should be settled in favour of Lord Ram temple in the Ayodhya land dispute case.

"On November 17, the Supreme Court of India will pronounce its verdict on the Ayodhya title dispute. There are two descendants of the Mughal empire in India. First is the familial descendants which are my family. The second is political descendants which is the government of India. Since the title of disputed land in question is still held in the name of Emperor Babar. As such, the title should either come to me or go to the government of India. The title should not go to any third party," he said.

"As I have already made it clear in public that if the Supreme Court settles the title in my favour or the government of India then I would like to appeal to the government of India to settle the title in favour of Ram temple," he added.

He further said that no mosque can be built or namaz can be offered on any disputed land.

"Lord Ram is known as Maryada Purushottam and is perceived as an ideal personality by several people. The whole world is watching us about how we are honouring Lord Ram," he said.

"I would like to appeal to all the people that they should respect the verdict of the Supreme Court in this respect. We should maintain peace and harmony in the wake of this verdict and celebrate the verdict as a matter of national importance like Independence day and Republic day," he added.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of petitions challenging September 30, 2010, Allahabad High Court judgement trifurcating the 2.77 acres of the disputed land at Ayodhya into three equal parts among Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board, and Nirmohi Akhara.

These three parties -- Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara --- however, knocked the door of the apex court challenging the Allahabad High Court verdict and sought the modification of the High Court judgement.

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court has concluded the hearing in the Ayodhya land dispute case and reserved its verdict.

The apex court is expected to deliver its verdict before November 17.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: indiaLord RamHigh CourtRam Lallaayodhya
Open in App

Related Stories

OpinionsWhy is Trump So Upset with India?

MumbaiMumbai Police Registers First FIR in Mahim for Feeding Pigeons Following BMC Complaint

MumbaiUniversity of Bristol Chooses Mumbai for Its First Overseas Campus, Set to Open in September 2026

NationalRaksha Bandhan 2025: Now You Can Send a Rakhi to Your Brother in India Post's Waterproof Envelope — Here's How to Track Your Parcel

NationalGold in Dubai Cheaper Than India: Pricing, Rules, and Import Limits Explained

National Realted Stories

NationalKarti Chidambaram backs India's firm rebuttal to Trump's tariff move

NationalOdisha to set up 835 model primary schools in first phase of flagship scheme

NationalHow US encouraged India to buy Russian oil to stabilise global energy markets

NationalDelhi Crime: Girl Shot Dead Inside Doctor’s Clinic in Jahangirpuri; Attacker on the Run

NationalCong's Manish Tewari invokes 1971 to counter US tariff move on India