City
Epaper

Can’t compare tenets of Sikhism with hijab: Supreme Court

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: September 9, 2022 12:55 IST

The Supreme Court on Thursday questioned the Muslim side as to how the hijab became necessary and compulsory for ...

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Thursday questioned the Muslim side as to how the hijab became necessary and compulsory for Muslim women when Namaz is not mandatory in Islam. The court cited the arguments of the Muslim side for this question, in which his lawyer said that it is not mandatory for the community to follow the five main principles of Islam (Namaz, Hajj, Roza, Zakat and Iman). A bench of Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia asked this question to Mohammad Nizamuddin Pasha, counsel for petitioner Fatma Bushra while hearing the Karnataka hijab controversy. Pasha, in his arguments in the court, had said that there is no obligation in Islam to compel its followers to follow the five principles of Islam. To this, the court questioned, 'How can hijab be said to be compulsory for Muslim women if five main Islamic principles are not compulsorily followed by Muslims in the absence of temporary punishment.'

Pasha told the court that Prophet Muhammad had said that a woman's veil was more important to him. He said 'The Qur'an tells to follow the words of the Prophet. A Muslim girl believes in wearing a hijab while stepping out of the house. In such a situation, why does the government favour in admission to educational institutions on the basis of religion? How can she ban her entry in hijab?' In his plea, he also said that banning entry of Muslim girl students wearing hijab into educational institutions would mean targeting the same religious community when Sikh students wear turbans inside schools.The court further observed that the five 'K's of Sikhism have been deemed necessary by laws and courts and the turban cannot be compared with the hijab.' Pasha argued that the 'five 'Ks' may have been rendered mandatory, but the turban is not considered essential. Sikhism is only 500 years old, but Islam is 1,400 years old. So if, in educational institutions, a 500-year-old religious practice is allowed, why ban a 1400-year-old practice?Pasha mentioned Quran says a real follower of Islam wouldn’t intervene in the spiritual practices of different communities and for themselves, they want to apply what the Quran says. The arguments will proceed on Monday.

Tags: Supreme CourtHijab row
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

MumbaiMumbai: Retired Bank Manager, Family Held in ‘Digital Arrest’ for 35 Days; ₹1.83 Crore Lost to Cyber Fraud in Mulund

InternationalDonald Trump's Global Tariffs Illegal : US Supreme Court Deals Major Blow to President

EntertainmentNeeraj Pandey Drops ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ Title; Supreme Court Closes Case

InternationalRamadan 2026 Moon Sighting in Saudi Arabia: Supreme Court of KSA Calls on Muslims to Search for Crescent on THIS Date

National Realted Stories

National"I know they are blackmailers...": DMK leader TKS Elangovan critiques BJP over Madurai Metro project

National'Superpowers like US, Israel bow before Iran': Shia leaders after ceasefire

National"Wave of change in Bengal": BJP candidate Dilip Ghosh campaigns in Kharagpur Sadar

NationalK'taka Dy CM Shivakumar seeks Himanta Biswa Sarma’s apology over remarks against Kharge

National"Fear, violence-free elections": ECI issues "straight-talk" to TMC in West Bengal