City
Epaper

Citizenship Act supersedes provisions outlined in passport manual: Delhi HC

By IANS | Updated: March 23, 2024 22:30 IST

New Delhi, March 23 The Delhi High Court has said that the Citizenship Act of 1955 supersedes the ...

Open in App

New Delhi, March 23 The Delhi High Court has said that the Citizenship Act of 1955 supersedes the provisions outlined in the Passport Manual of 2020, affirming that subordinate legislation cannot override primary legislation.

Justice Subramaniam Prasad delivered the verdict in response to a plea filed by two minor children challenging the authorities' decision to revoke their Indian passports and refusing to reissue them.

The children, born to Indian parents who later migrated to the US, sought the court's intervention to compel the authorities to issue them Indian passports free of charge.

Their father retained his Indian citizenship, while their mother acquired US citizenship under Section 9 of the Citizenship Act.

Justice Prasad ruled in favour of the children, saying that they fulfilled the criteria outlined in Section 4(1)(A) of the Citizenship Act, which stipulates that a minor holding citizenship of India and another country must renounce the citizenship of one country within six months of reaching adulthood to retain the Indian citizenship.

Highlighting the government's position, the court referenced a circular issued in February 2011, which acknowledged that minors may hold dual citizenship until they reach the age of majority and decide to renounce one citizenship.

The court underscored that even the government recognised a minor's entitlement to an Indian passport and the option to renounce foreign citizenship to maintain Indian nationality.

Moreover, the court noted that the Passport Manual of 2020, cited by the authorities to justify their decision, contradicted the Citizenship Act.

It said the subordinate legislation cannot override the primary legislation, asserting the supremacy of the Citizenship Act over the Passport Manual.

Consequently, the court concluded that there was no legal impediment to granting the petitioners' request, thereby allowing the writ petition.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

International"I blew my stack": Trump says he got hoarse voice from shouting over trade policy

Cricket"He absolutely tore shreds off me": Khawaja recounts fiery sledging encounter with McCullum

BusinessColgate debuts first-ever Visible White Purple Serum: A game-changer in oral beauty

BusinessThe Circle.Work Expands Its Pan-India Network, Launches in Goa

NationalAndhra Pradesh Tragedy: Man Dies After Being Run Over During Attempt to Overtake Lorry, Disturbing Footage Surfaced

National Realted Stories

NationalTN ration shop staff struggle with 'inadequate' funds for essential commodities' deliveries

NationalBengaluru man claims divorced wife harassed, threatens to blow up metro station

NationalDelhi Red Fort Car Blast: ED Searches Shaheen Bagh Amid Focus on Foreign Funding and Money Laundering

National'Suicidal', Uddhav's Shiv Sena attacks Congress for going solo in BMC polls

NationalNDA steps up alliance drive in TN for 2026 Assembly polls