City
Epaper

Delhi court pulls up Unnao rape survivor's counsel for posting details of in-camera proceedings online

By ANI | Updated: October 5, 2019 21:45 IST

A Delhi court on Saturday pulled up the lawyer of the Unnao rape survivor for allegedly posting the details of the in-camera proceedings on Facebook.

Open in App

A Delhi court on Saturday pulled up the lawyer of the Unnao rape survivor for allegedly posting the details of the in-camera proceedings on Facebook.

A lawyer representing an accused had made this complaint in the Tis Hazari Court and submitted some Facebook post detail in the court.

However, Dharmendra Mishra, who is the lawyer of the rape survivor, clarified that he has been posting only minutes details, the emanate from the order of the court and nothing beyond that.

Judge Dharmesh Sharma said, "It is again impressed upon the parties to refrain from reporting the proceedings and the evidence being recorded by the court to the media."

The court, which is hearing the Unnao rape case on a day-to-day basis, today cross-examined the mother of the Unnao rape survivor in connection with a case pertaining to the custodial death of survivor's father.

The hearing, however, could not be completed as the counsel of one of the accused did not appear before the court. The matter is now slated for October 9.

Pursuant to the mother's cross-examination, survivor's sister will be questioned in the court.

Special Judge Dharmesh Sharma had on August 14 framed charges against Kuldeep Sengar and three police personnel and five others for allegedly framing the rape survivor's father in an illegal arms possession case.

Sengar and others were charged for the offences punishable under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including murder, criminal intimidation and false evidence and Section 25 (punishment for possession of prohibited arms and ammunition) of the Arms Act.

The court had passed the order on an FIR related to Arms Act and custodial death of survivor's father. It has clubbed both the Arms Act case and the death in custody case after observing several witnesses are same and incidents are connected.

The court had earlier observed that the accused carried out a series of act to detain and silence him so that he does not pursue his complaint.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: Kuldeep SengarFIR
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraVirar Crime: Illegal Sperm Storage Center Busted; Two Booked

MaharashtraMaharashtra: FIR Registered Against Singer Anjali Bharti Over Derogatory Remarks on Amruta Fadnavis

NationalUnnao Rape Case: 'I Have Faith in SC,' Says Survivor After CBI Moves Apex Court

MumbaiMumbai Sees Sharp Rise in Missing Cases as 82 People — Including 60 Women — Vanish in Just 36 Days

NationalChandigarh IPS Officer Suicide Case: FIR Filed Against Haryana DGP and Rohtak SP; NCSC Seeks Report

National Realted Stories

NationalGIFT City fund ecosystem surges 60-fold to $32 billion, FMEs rise 25-fold

NationalMild 3.6 magnitude earthquake jolts MP's Barwani

NationalUS ‘forced’ into ceasefire, says Iran Supreme Leader’s India representative

NationalMP aims for farmer prosperity, agri revolution, says CM Yadav at 'Krishi Manthan 2026'

NationalBJP accuses Cong of ‘tukde tukde’ politics as Gujarati groups protest in Delhi against Kharge's remarks