City
Epaper

Delhi court to hear Hyd bizman Arun Pillai's interim bail plea in excise policy case on Dec 4

By IANS | Updated: December 1, 2023 22:05 IST

New Delhi, Dec 1 A Delhi court on Friday partly heard the arguments on an interim bail plea ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 1 A Delhi court on Friday partly heard the arguments on an interim bail plea of Hyderabad-based liquor businessman Arun Ramchandran Pillai, who is an accused in the now-scrapped Delhi excise policy case, and posted the matter for further hearing on December 4.

On Pillai's interim bail plea seeking an eight-week release due to his wife's medical condition, the central probe agency Enforcement Directorate (ED) has to now file a reply. Before Special Judge MK Nagpal of the Rouse Avenue Court, Pillai's counsel Advocate Nitesh Rana submitted that his client's wife is extremely sick, and that she has no one to look after as she lives alone.

Pillai was arrested on March 6 and is currently in judicial custody.

Earlier this month, the ED filed a reply before the Delhi High Court on the bail plea of Pillai.

It also filed a response on another petition terming his arrest as illegal, and violative of Section 19(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Earlier, citing the Supreme Court mandate of providing grounds of arrest as mandatory and of utmost importance, in the petition, Pillai had stated that no grounds for arrest, either oral or written, were ever provided to him, as is required under Section 19(1) of PMLA.

The plea further stated that none of the impugned remand orders record any satisfaction of whether the ED had materials on record to form "reasons to believe" that Pillai is guilty of an offence under the PMLA.

"It is pertinent to mention that the purported facts that have been asserted by the respondent agency (ED) in the remand application were asserted even in the first prosecution complaint filed," the plea read. "The petitioner/applicant has appeared before the ED at least on 9 (nine) occasions after the filing of first prosecution complaint and at least on 3 (three) occasions after filing of the second prosecution complaint on which occasions the petitioner/applicant was never arrested by the respondent agency," it stated.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

AurangabadPrabhag formation favours ruling parties; troubles opposition

AurangabadSpecial round of 11th admission to begin on Aug 25

Other SportsDPL 2025 double-header washed out due to rain at Arun Jaitley Stadium

NationalRailway Board chairman discusses Bairabi–Sairang railway project with Mizoram CM

NationalBJP holing camps to deliver central schemes to households in Punjab: State party chief Jakhar

National Realted Stories

NationalKamal Haasan calls for education to be shifted to state list, rejects Centre’s language push

NationalMidnight knocks: Viral video reveals ‘UPA-era intimidation’ over then-CM Modi interview

NationalCongress launches Dr Manmohan Singh Fellows Programme to empower professionals for social justice

National'I too aspired to become space scientist, but destiny made me enter politics', says Raj Dy CM Diya Kumari

NationalInsulting women is a tradition in Congress: Vishvas Sarang