City
Epaper

Delhi HC acquits five molestation-murder convicts giving benefit of doubt

By ANI | Updated: May 25, 2022 12:00 IST

The Delhi High Court acquitted five molestation-murder convicts giving them the benefit of doubt while terming the testimony of eyewitnesses as not truthful.

Open in App

The Delhi High Court acquitted five molestation-murder convicts giving them the benefit of doubt while terming the testimony of eyewitnesses as not truthful.

The appellant had been awarded life imprisonment by the trial court in 2019.

They had challenged the trial court order of conviction and sentence. This case is connected with the molestation and murder of a woman in the Uttam Nagar area on the night of 28-29 March 2014.

The Division Bench of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani allowed five criminal appeals and set aside the judgement of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial court.

The appeals were filed by Mantoo Sharma, Beerpal, Mohd. Naseem alias Samim, Naresh alias Anna and Jaipal. The High Court has acquitted them and directed the release of the accused from custody unless required in any other case.

The bench while acquitting five appellants observed, " On the touchstone of the cardinal principle of criminal jurisprudence that 'contradictions' in testimony are not acceptable, though 'discrepancies' may be, we are not persuaded to accept the testimony of eyewitness as being truthful."

"The eyewitness had confessed in the court that on the date of the incident he had consumed ganja. This yet again makes us doubt the credibility of the prosecution witness as an eyewitness," the bench observed in the judgement of May 24, 2022.

The bench also observed, "If two views are possible on the evidence adduced in a case, the view favouring the innocence of the accused should be adopted, in our opinion, in this case, there are clearly two views that are possible in light of the several material contradictions in the prosecution case. Such contradictions must ensure the benefits of the accused and we are therefore persuaded to accept the view favourable to the accused persons."

The case pertains to the molestation and murder of a woman. The allegation was that some of the appellants made the deceased consume liquor, and subsequently molested her and then hit her on the head with a beer bottle and with pieces of brick and stone, which led to her death. The appellants were arrested pursuant to FIR. They were convicted of murder by Tees Hazari Court.

The High Court also observed in the judgement, "No beer bottle nor any shards of glass were recovered from the crime scene; nor were any traces of alcohol found in the victim's body during post-mortem.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Anup jairam bhambhaniDelhi High CourtHigh CourtSiddharth mridulDelhi delhi high courtHong kong high courtU.k. high court
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

NationalCan Mother-in-Law File Case Against Daughter-in-Law Under Domestic Violence Act? Here’s What Allahabad High Court Rules

NationalRCB Approaches Delhi High Court Against Uber Over Advertisement Featuring Travis Head

NationalSupreme Court Judges Unanimously Agreed To Declare Their Assets

NationalOdisha: High Court Grants Divorce Over Wife’s Mental Harassment and Suicide Threats

National Realted Stories

NationalHoneymoon murder case: Meghalaya Police question over 20 people in Indore

NationalDelhi govt to expand SC/ST/OBC scholarship outreach, hostels: Minister Ravinder Indraj

NationalRahul thanks PM Modi for extending greetings on 55th birthday

NationalUnprecedented development in Bengal Assembly as speeches of all BJP legislators expunged

NationalProtest erupts against vandalism of Tagore’s ancestral home in B’desh