City
Epaper

Delhi HC asks Centre to reply on plea challenging appointment of president of medical assesement, rating board for NCISM

By ANI | Updated: September 28, 2021 14:45 IST

The Delhi High Court has asked the Centre and others to file a reply on plea challenging the appointment of the president of the medical assessment and rating board for the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (NCISM).

Open in App

The Delhi High Court has asked the Centre and others to file a reply on plea challenging the appointment of the president of the medical assessment and rating board for the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (NCISM).

The petitioner has sought to call the entire record of the selection process of the President of the accreditation Board of the NCISM under the impugned notification dated June 9, 2021.

A Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh asked the Centre, NCISM and others to file a reply on the plea and listed the matter for November 28 for further hearing.

The Court was hearing a petition filed by Raghunandan Sharma through advocate Ashok Kumar Panigarhi and Gautam Kumar Laha.

Sharma, an ayurvedic doctor and former President of erstwhile CCIM, has challenged the appointment of Raghuram Bhatt as the President of the medical assessment and rating board for the Indian system of Medicine.

The Medical Assessment and Rating Board for the Indian system of Medicine constitutes of a President and eight members and the board is responsible to keep the standard of Medical Education in the Indian system of medicine.

The petitioner claimed that Bhatt despite having not any administrative experience in any premier private, semi govt or govt sector, has been selected as President of the Medical Assessment and Rating Board for the Indian system of Medicine of the newly established National Commission.

"By this, an incompetent person has been given the responsibility to control the entire AYUSH education of this country and abroad as a President of the Medical Assessment and Rating Board. As such, the verythe selection process is under cloud with respect to its competency," the petitioner said.

He called the entire selection biased and arbitrary and tainted with prior collusion in the absence of transparency.

The petitioner has sought to quash the appointment of the Respondent number 3 (Bhatt) being a disqualified candidate as per the prescribed qualification under the relevant act.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: National commission for indian system of medicineRaghunandan sharmaDelhi High CourtJyoti SinghDelhi delhi high court
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessAnil Ambani Files Defamation Case Against Cobrapost Over Defamatory' Reporting

EntertainmentSunjay Kapur Property Dispute: Delhi HC Backs Karisma Kapoor’s Children, Rejects Priya Kapur’s Secrecy Bid

EntertainmentAR Rahman Secures Relief as Delhi High Court Overturns Single-Judge Order in Veera Raja Veera Copyright Case

NationalSupreme Court Adjourns Hearing on Bail Pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and Others in Delhi Riots Case

MumbaiBomb Threat At Bombay Hight Court Entire Premises Evacuated

National Realted Stories

NationalPiyush Goyal, New Zealand Trade Minister makes headway in FTA talks

NationalDefence Secretary reviews roads, infra in Central Sector's forward locations

NationalRSS ban row: K’taka govt order violates fundamental rights, rules HC

NationalBengal Fire minister's son-in-law appears before ED in municipal recruitment scam case

NationalRed Fort blast: Jaish suicide bomber used TATP ‘shoe bomb’