City
Epaper

Delhi HC dismisses PIL against ED over interpretation of PMLA's Section 66

By IANS | Updated: April 29, 2024 13:40 IST

New Delhi, April 29 The Delhi High Court on Monday refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) ...

Open in App

New Delhi, April 29 The Delhi High Court on Monday refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that questioned the interpretation of Section 66 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The petitioners, Ashok Kumar Singh and another individual alleged that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) was improperly influencing other agencies, including the police and CBI, to initiate FIRs based on information it shared under this section.

The petition had accused the ED of acting in multiple conflicting roles by pressuring agencies to register FIRs, thereby overstepping its boundaries as laid out in the PMLA.

Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora heard the case and said that such interpretation issues be addressed in specific proceedings before an appropriate court.

During the proceedings, ED's counsel, Zoheb Hossain, argued that the PIL was more about serving private interests rather than public welfare.

He claimed that the petition mirrored concerns already raised in a separate petition pending before a single judge, thus attempting to overreach the court's process.

Hossain said that a PIL should not be used to address individual grievances disguised as public causes, labelling such actions as an abuse of the legal process.

On the other hand, the petitioner's counsel maintained that advocating for a client on a specific legal issue does not preclude raising the same issue in the form of a PIL, provided there is no personal interest involved.

Ultimately, the division bench concluded that the matter could be effectively resolved by a single judge since it did not challenge the constitutional validity of the section in question.

The bench noted that parties involved in criminal proceedings have the liberty to contest the interpretations and proceedings at appropriate times and forums.

The court disposed of the petition, reaffirming the right to address the interpretation of Section 66 of the PMLA in a relevant legal setting.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Entertainment'Sharknado' 7 in works, Anthony Ferrante to direct

AurangabadDefacing heritage look of smart buses for 50 lakh revenue against advertisements

AurangabadPromise of a loan turns into kidnapping and assault

AurangabadAcquitted man attacked minutes after release

Other Sports"Proud moment for us that India is hosting World Cup Finals": Two-time World Champion Nikhat Zareen

National Realted Stories

NationalPM Modi lays foundation stone for Eklavya Model Residential School in Arunachal's remote district

NationalRaj Transport dept issues over 19,000 challans; 1,034 vehicles seized

NationalSIR program: Rajasthan leads India in online count form submission; 9.5 million uploaded

NationalMP govt launches 'Shalini App' for tribals to mark 150th birth anniversary of Birsa Munda

NationalKolkata Municipal Corporation doubles issuing of birth and death certificates to help citizens in Bengal SIR