City
Epaper

ED's power to issue summons under Sec 50 PMLA doesn't entitle it to arrest: Delhi HC

By IANS | Updated: October 19, 2023 17:30 IST

New Delhi, Oct 19 The Delhi High Court on Thursday held that the power of the Enforcement Directorate ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Oct 19 The Delhi High Court on Thursday held that the power of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to issue summons to a person under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) does not include the power to arrest.

Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani made the ruling while hearing a plea moved by Ashish Mittal seeking quashing of an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered by the ED in 2020.

Mittal also sought stay of all the proceedings emanating from the said ECIR.

Justice Bhambhani stated that the power to arrest is "conspicuously absent" in Section 50 of the PMLA, which empowers ED officers to arrest any person, subject to satisfying the conditions mentioned therein.

He said that the power to issue summons, require the production of documents, and record statements, which is akin to the powers of a civil court, is distinct from the power to arrest under Section 19 of the PMLA.

Section 19 of the PMLA Act provides for inbuilt safeguards to be adhered to by the authorised officers, such as recording reasons in writing for the belief regarding the involvement of the person in the offence of money laundering and informing the person being arrested of the grounds of his arrest.

The court clarified that Sections 19 and 50 of the PMLA are separate provisions, and the exercise of powers under one should not be restricted based on the apprehension that it could lead to the exercise of powers under the other, as such a position would be antithetical to the statutory scheme.

The court dismissed the plea by Mittal, who had expressed strong apprehension about illegal detention or arrest and believed that he would be made a scapegoat. However, the court found no basis to support these concerns and ruled that the petitioner was not entitled to a copy of the ECIR.

While the court clarified that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is not barred in such cases, it said that the petitioner's apprehension of coercive measures was unfounded in this instance.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentZareen Khan drops a glimpse of her intense workout session as she strengthens her core

BusinessBanks at crossroads as AI costs rise and risks escalate: S&P Report

BusinessPunjab Attracts Investor Interest at Hyderabad Roadshow Ahead of Summit 2026

InternationalAfghanistan slams Pakistan's 'unrealistic demands' after talks collapse in Turkey

InternationalReferendum on July Charter to be held alongside National Parliamentary Elections: Bangladesh Chief Advisor

National Realted Stories

National'Not every Kashmiri is a terrorist': J&K CM Omar Abdullah

NationalAnta bypoll result tomorrow, constituency’s unique political trend in focus

NationalDelhi blast: Over 36 picked up for questioning in Kashmir

NationalBJP criticises Siddaramaiah govt for petrol price hike 'proposal'

NationalHardeep Puri, HD Hyundai chief discuss partnership in shipbuilding