City
Epaper

Exclusion of creamy layer from SCs, STs: Top court hear matter after 2 weeks

By ANI | Updated: December 2, 2019 15:30 IST

The Supreme Court on Monday posted after two weeks hearing of a plea after Attorney General KK Venugopal urged the court to refer to the 7-judge bench the issue raised in the plea relating to exclusion of creamy layer from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes community for benefit of reservations.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Monday posted after two weeks hearing of a plea after Attorney General KK Venugopal urged the court to refer to the 7-judge bench the issue raised in the plea relating to exclusion of creamy layer from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes community for benefit of reservations.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde said it will hear the plea after two weeks.The petitioner prays the top court to "issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of mandamus to the Respondents Government of India (specific reference to President of India) to amend The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 and The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order 1950 issued in exercise of power vested under Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India after evolving and undertaking an objective and rational test for identification of the creamy layer amongst the SCs/STs and separating the same from the non-creamy layer SCs/STs with respect to affirmative action/reservation law made under Articles 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution of India."

The petition urged the top court to "issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of mandamus to the Respondents to formulate a 'means test' for identification of 'creamy layer in Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes' under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution."

"Issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of mandamus to the Respondents to identify 'creamy layer in Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes' and exclude the same from receiving benefits under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution," it added.

It also sought Supreme Court to "pass such other order(s) or direction(s) as this court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in favour of the petitioner."

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: indiaThe Supreme CourtSupreme CourtKk Venugopal
Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIranian President Calls for Constructive Role of Brics to Halt West Asia Conflict During Talks With PM Modi

LifestyleEid 2026 Date: When Will Saudi Arabia, UAE and India Celebrate Eid-ul-Fitr?

MaharashtraMaharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Unfurls 200-Foot National Flag at Nagpur’s Kasturchand Park

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

NationalAhmedabad Traffic Update for India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup Final: Check Road Closures and Alternate Routes Near Narendra Modi Stadium

National Realted Stories

NationalBye-election between the poor and the rich, Cong will lose: Karnataka BJP

NationalRajasthan CM to inspect under-construction Chambal aqueduct in Bundi tomorrow

NationalBengal polls: Illegal items valued at Rs 327.44 crore seized from Feb 26 to April 6

NationalUttarakhand CM chairs meeting ahead of PM Modi's visit to Uttarakhand

NationalChandrababu Naidu unable to politically counter MAVIGUN proposal: Jagan