City
Epaper

Exclusion of creamy layer from SCs, STs: Top court hear matter after 2 weeks

By ANI | Updated: December 2, 2019 15:30 IST

The Supreme Court on Monday posted after two weeks hearing of a plea after Attorney General KK Venugopal urged the court to refer to the 7-judge bench the issue raised in the plea relating to exclusion of creamy layer from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes community for benefit of reservations.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Monday posted after two weeks hearing of a plea after Attorney General KK Venugopal urged the court to refer to the 7-judge bench the issue raised in the plea relating to exclusion of creamy layer from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes community for benefit of reservations.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde said it will hear the plea after two weeks.The petitioner prays the top court to "issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of mandamus to the Respondents Government of India (specific reference to President of India) to amend The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 and The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order 1950 issued in exercise of power vested under Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India after evolving and undertaking an objective and rational test for identification of the creamy layer amongst the SCs/STs and separating the same from the non-creamy layer SCs/STs with respect to affirmative action/reservation law made under Articles 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution of India."

The petition urged the top court to "issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of mandamus to the Respondents to formulate a 'means test' for identification of 'creamy layer in Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes' under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution."

"Issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of mandamus to the Respondents to identify 'creamy layer in Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes' and exclude the same from receiving benefits under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution," it added.

It also sought Supreme Court to "pass such other order(s) or direction(s) as this court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in favour of the petitioner."

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: indiaThe Supreme CourtSupreme CourtKk Venugopal
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiMumbai: Gold Sales Cross ₹12,000 Crores Nationwide on Akshaya Tritiya; Mumbai MMR Sees ₹800 Crores Trade

NationalAkshaya Tritiya 2025: Gold Market Sees Huge Footfall Despite Price Hike (Watch Video)

NationalJustice BR Gavai Appointed as 52nd Chief Justice of India, Oath on May 14

NationalSexually Explicit Content on OTT, Social Media: Supreme Court Issues Notice to Centre

MaharashtraOver 10,000 Pakistani Nationals Traced in Maharashtra and Delhi Post-Palgham Terror Attack

National Realted Stories

NationalEC to use digital data for speedy removal of dead voters’ names from electoral rolls

NationalJust conducting exercise won't change social realities: Prashant Kishor on caste census

NationalCongress leader questions timing of Centre's decision on caste census

NationalMaha govt's women and child development department ranks 1st in administration reform exercise

NationalCaste census: PM Modi wishes all communities to get equal benefits, says K’taka BJP