City
Epaper

HC rebukes Rajasthan govt over delay in panchayat polls, seeks compliance from state EC

By IANS | Updated: August 19, 2025 13:00 IST

Jaipur, Aug 19 In a significant ruling, the Rajasthan High Court delivered a stern rebuke to the state ...

Open in App

Jaipur, Aug 19 In a significant ruling, the Rajasthan High Court delivered a stern rebuke to the state government for delaying Panchayati Raj Institution (PRI) elections under the pretext of delimitation and has directed that a copy of the order be sent to the Chief Secretary and the State Election Commission for immediate compliance.

Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand passed the order after hearing 17 petitions filed by Mahavir Prasad Gautam and others.

The court observed that the failure to conduct elections within the prescribed timeframe amounts to a direct violation of the Constitution. It emphasized that local body elections must be held within five years of the previous term, and any postponement cannot exceed six months.

Justice Dhand stated that if the government fails to conduct elections on time, it becomes the constitutional responsibility of the State Election Commission to intervene and restore democratic local governance.

The court warned that the absence of elected local representatives creates a governance vacuum and adversely affects public service delivery.

The court also addressed the issue of suspended Panchayat administrators.

Petitioners argued that after the term of elected Sarpanchs ended, the state government had issued a notification on January 16 appointing them as administrators due to election delays. However, they were later removed without a proper inquiry or hearing. Petitioners argued that the government’s actions violated the Constitution, the Panchayati Raj Act, and the Municipality Act.

The court found the removal to be procedurally flawed and ordered the reinstatement of the administrators, allowing the government to take action again -- if necessary -- only after following due legal process.

The state government contended that the petitioners had no constitutional right to continue as administrators once their five-year term had ended and that investigations were pending. However, the court sided with the petitioners on the grounds of procedural impropriety in their removal.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentKantara Chapter 1: Gulshan Devaiah’s Regal First Look as Kulashekara Unveiled, Pan-India Prequel to Release in Seven Languages

EntertainmentHansal Mehta pays homage to Achyut Potdar: Was a fan of his character as Jaggu Dada's Father

Other Sports"Everyone is fully fit and training with commitment": Vijay Malik Telugu Titans' PKL 2025 preparation

BusinessIndia’s textile exports to US and Europe crossed $20 billion in 2024-25: Minister

BusinessApna Vikas: A.I.-Based Mentor & Coach To Manage People And Their Perspectives

National Realted Stories

NationalIndia’s textile exports to US and Europe crossed $20 billion in 2024-25: Minister

NationalDecks cleared for IIM Guwahati as LS clears IIM Amendment Bill without discussion

NationalBengal: Job seekers stage demonstration seeking immediate recruitment in primary schools

NationalMammootty all set for a comeback after seven-month break

NationalMaha Cabinet waives Stamp Duty for cancer hospital; reviews situation arising out of incessant rains