City
Epaper

Judicial Pay Commission recommendations: 17 Chief Secretaries to appear before SC on Tuesday

By IANS | Updated: August 26, 2024 16:40 IST

New Delhi, Aug 26 The Chief Secretaries of 17 states and Union Territories will remain physically present on ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 26 The Chief Secretaries of 17 states and Union Territories will remain physically present on Tuesday before the Supreme Court over the non-implementation of the Second National Judicial Pay Commission's (SNJPC) recommendations.

In an order passed last week, a bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, ordered the Chief Secretaries and the Finance Secretaries of the defaulting states and UTs to "remain personally present" before it on August 27 at 10.30 am.

Amicus curiae and senior advocate K. Parameshar, who is assisting the court, apprised the Bench, also comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, that the states of Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, Chhattisgarh, Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Kerala, Bihar, Haryana, and Odisha and the Union Territories of Delhi, J&K, and Ladakh have not complied with the SC orders requiring revision of pay scale and retiral benefits for judicial officers.

In an earlier hearing, the apex court had ordered “full compliance” of its orders by August 20 and cautioned the Chief Secretaries and Finance Secretaries of contempt action.

The Supreme Court had ordered the implementation of the proposals of the Second National Judicial Pay Commission, chaired by former apex court judge Justice P.V. Reddy on the revision of pay and pension for judicial officers, with effect from January 1, 2016, after a plea was filed by the All India Judges Association for the constitution of the All India Judicial Commission to review the service conditions of the judges of the district judiciary.

In its decision, the top court had said: "The work of a judge cannot be assessed solely in terms of their duties during court working hours. The state is under an affirmative obligation to ensure dignified conditions of work for its judicial officers and it cannot raise the defence of an increase in financial burden or expenditure."

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalKerala HC directs MLA Rahul Mamkootathil not to be arrested till January 7

NationalCalcutta HC scraps PIL challenging proposed construction of Babri Mosque at Beldanga

NationalTN BJP urges Palaniswami to support Navodaya schools in state

HealthStruggling With Winter Hair Fall? These 5 Home Remedies May Be Making It Worse

InternationalEyeing robust cooperation across diverse sectors, PM Modi and Oman Sultan hold discussions in Muscat

National Realted Stories

NationalJagan terms privatisation of medical colleges in Andhra ‘mother of all scams’

NationalDelhi Police bust fake call centre targeting US citizens; 7 arrested

National'Officially the A team of BJP', Sajad Lone attacks CM Omar Abdullah, NC

NationalIndia has seen transformational economic change in last 11 years, PM Modi tells diaspora in Oman

NationalMoS Margherita, Fiji Health Minister discuss medical cooperation