City
Epaper

Kerala HC lambasts Vijayan govt for shielding accused in cashew import corruption case

By IANS | Updated: November 17, 2025 13:55 IST

Kochi, Nov 17 The Kerala High Court on Monday came down heavily on the Pinarayi Vijayan government for ...

Open in App

Kochi, Nov 17 The Kerala High Court on Monday came down heavily on the Pinarayi Vijayan government for refusing to grant sanction to the CBI to prosecute two key accused in the multi-crore Cashew Development Corporation corruption case.

The Single Bench asked why the government was “protecting the corrupt” and warned that it would be compelled to record such an observation in its order if the state government continued its present stance.

The criticism was directed at the government’s decision to deny prosecution sanction for former Corporation chairman and Congress leader R. Chandrasekharan, and former Managing Director P.A. Ratheesh.

The Bench observed that a government committed to the rule of law should not be seen shielding individuals facing serious corruption allegations.

The petition challenging the denial of a sanction will be taken up again next week.

The CBI had earlier sought permission to prosecute the two after identifying large-scale irregularities in cashew imports, estimated at around Rs 500 crore.

The investigation covered transactions between 2006 and 2015, following a High Court directive that handed over the case to the central agency.

After nearly five years of inquiry, the CBI reportedly found substantial financial discrepancies and submitted its final report, prompting the request for sanctions.

While the High Court had once quashed the state government’s earlier refusal and asked it to reconsider the matter within 45 days, the Industries Department -- upon re-examination -- again rejected the CBI’s plea.

In the latest order denying sanction, the government argued that the CBI had failed to produce any new evidence beyond what was already available in its original report.

The state government contended that although the agency had pointed to procedural lapses and administrative errors in procurement, it could not establish that the accused had derived any illegal benefit, misused official position, or acted with criminal intent.

The CBI, however, maintains that the scale and pattern of the irregularities warrant prosecution.

With the High Court’s sharp criticism now on record, the state government will face renewed scrutiny when the matter is heard again next week.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalTrump links immigration enforcement to crime drop

InternationalMaduro's arrest rests on strong legal footing: US Constitutional Expert (IANS interview)

InternationalTrump says Venezuela to send up to 50 million barrels of oil to US

InternationalEx-Pentagon spokesman raises legal, credibility concerns over Venezuela action (IANS interview)

InternationalTrump urges Republicans to stay united ahead of midterm elections

National Realted Stories

National'Nothing but illusion', says K'taka BJP President Vijayendra on Siddaramaiah's CM record

NationalTrump says PM Modi is unhappy with him due to tariff, seeks early Apache delivery

NationalKarnataka: Man dies by suicide, cites superstar Yash’s views on parenting in WhatsApp note

NationalTeacher kidnapped in broad daylight in Bihar’s Saran

NationalECI clarifies Abhishek Banerjee's claims on SIR hearing notice to Nobel laureate Amartya Sen