City
Epaper

Lawyers move SC against policemen over PHQ protest

By IANS | Published: November 07, 2019 10:46 PM

Several lawyers moved the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court on Thursday seeking departmental probe against the Delhi Police personnel, who protested in front of the Delhi Police headquarters (PHQ) at ITO on November 5.

Open in App

The plea in the high court, filed by Rakesh Kumar Lakhra, also seeks disciplinary action against several IPS officers and senior cops, including Madhur Verna, Aslam Khan, Meghna Yadav and Sanyukta Parashar, for circulating provocative statements on social media.

It was in complete violation of prevalent laws, it said. The petition is likely to come up for hearing on November 8.

Another petition has been filed in the Supreme Court, seeking disciplinary action and registration of first information report (FIR) against the cops involved in the recent protest at the PHQ.

The petition was filed by advocates G.S. Mani, Rajesh Kumar Maurya and Pradeep Kumar Yadav. They demanded setting up of a special investigation team (SIT), headed by a retired judge of the Supreme Court or the Delhi High Court, to conduct investigation, and appropriate action against all the police personal who participated in the protest.

The advocates also sought direction to ensure that the law and order was maintained, and safety and security of innocent lawyers, who were under attack by cops, was protected.

The petitioner said the 11-hour protest by the police personnel was shocking and unprecedented. It also violated Section 3 of the Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966, which prohibited policemen to form association and to participate in, or address, any meeting or take part in any demonstration, the petition said.

"The police agitation and protest against lawyers is not only against these provision, but is also dangerous for the civilised society. Such agitation and protest by the police forces violate the fundamental right of life, liberty, safety and security of lawyers as well as fellow citizens," the petitioner said.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalWife Accuses Husband of Rape for Taking Her to Afghanistan; Supreme Court Stays Proceedings

NationalSupreme Court Rejects ED Objection Over Arvind Kejriwal’s ‘Vote for AAP or Will To Go Jail on June 2’ Comment

NationalMukhtar Ansari Prayer Meet: SC Grants Abbas Ansari Permission To Attend Private Ceremony With Family

National'Arrest and Remand Illegal': Supreme Court Orders Release of NewsClick Founder Prabir Purkayastha in UAPA Case

NationalBureau of Indian Standards Takes Steps To Simplify Hospital Bills

National Realted Stories

NationalINDIA bloc leaders day dreaming to become Prime Ministers: PM Modi

NationalSwati Maliwal Assault Case: Delhi Police to Scrutinise CCTV Footage at Kejriwal’s House To Investigate Complaint

NationalNCP state chief visited Nashik hotel where Sharad Pawar stayed, claims NCP(SP) leader

NationalIs CM Vijayan cutting short foreign trip to tackle Kerala's impending financial crisis?

NationalHeatwave in Rajasthan, Sri Ganganagar sizzles at 46.3 degrees Celsius