City
Epaper

'Let religious people handle', SC declines AP plea against HC order on Ahobilam Mutt temple

By IANS | Updated: January 27, 2023 15:40 IST

New Delhi, Jan 27 The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a plea by the Andhra Pradesh ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 27 The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a plea by the Andhra Pradesh government against a high court order, which held that the state had no authority under law to appoint an executive officer to the Ahobilam Mutt temple in Kurnool district.

A bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul told the counsel, representing the Andhra Pradesh government, to let the religious people handle this matter.

The bench, also comprising Justice A.S. Oka asked why is the state government stepping into this matter, and added: "Let the temple people deal with it... Why should religious places not be left to religious people?"

The top court said that Andhra Pradesh has no jurisdiction or entitlement under law to appoint an executive officer of the 'Sri Ahobila Mutt Parampara Aadheena Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Devasthanam' (the Ahobilam Mutt temple).

It told the state government lawyer: "In every case under Article 136, we need not try to settle the law. Sorry."

After hearing the arguments, the top court declined to entertain the state government and others' appeal against the high court order.

A petition before the high court contended that the Ahobilam temple has been under the control of Sri Ahobilam Mutt, which is based in Tamil Nadu, since time immemorial.

The high court had said appointing an executive officer for the temple, which is a part of the mutt, violated Article 26(d) of the Constitution as it affects the right of administration of Jeeyars'/Mathadipathis.

The Andhra Pradesh government and others had challenged the high court order passed in October last year.

It made it clear that the temple is an integral part of the Ahobilam Mutt and the contention raised by the state government that the temple and Mutt were distinct entities cannot be entertained.

The high court further added that said the temple is an integral and inseparable part of the Ahobilam mutt, which was established as a part of the propagation of Hindu religion and for rendering spiritual service for propagating Sri Vaishnavism.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: The Three Just MenSanjay Kishan KaulSupreme CourtSanjay kishanSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelCanadian supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

National Realted Stories

NationalKTR to lead BRS delegation at meeting called by Election Commission

NationalPlea in SC challenges Gujarat's 27 pc OBC quota in local bodies

National‘Two rupee doctor’ of Kerala's Kannur passes away

NationalMinisters urge Kerala Governor to follow SC directives while making appointment to VC posts

NationalIllegal drone operators will be booked under Gangster Act: CM Yogi