City
Epaper

Mere conviction cannot be ground for dismissal: Allahabad HC

By IANS | Updated: October 5, 2023 09:15 IST

Prayagraj (UP), Oct 5 The Allahabad High Court recently held that before dismissal of an employee from ...

Open in App

Prayagraj (UP), Oct 5 The Allahabad High Court recently held that before dismissal of an employee from service, the authority must look at the conduct that led to his conviction on criminal charge.

"Mechanical order of dismissal cannot be passed based on mere conviction," the court added.

Allowing a writ petition filed by one Vishwanath Vishwakarma, Justice Neeraj Tiwari said, "The apex court has considered this issue repeatedly and has held that even after conviction of an employee, his conduct must be considered while passing the removal or dismissal order, as without that, any order of dismissal is improper."

The petitioner worked as Lekhpal in Sultanpur district and was promoted in 1994 and 2000.

In 1992, an FIR was lodged against the petitioner under section 302 (murder) and other sections. After trial, the petitioner was convicted for life imprisonment under section-302 (murder) in 2009 and was taken into custody.

He was released on bail in 2017.

Due to his conviction, he had been dismissed from service on August 30, 2014, a day before his superannuation.

A departmental appeal was filed by the petitioner, wherein direction was issued to pay GPF only.

The remaining post retiral dues would be released according to the decision of the high court in criminal appeal, it was added.

The petitioner challenged the two orders on the ground that under Article 311(2)(a), conviction cannot be sole ground for dismissal from service and past conduct must be factored in.

It was argued that the authority had failed to apply its mind while passing the order. The petitioner relied on the decision of Supreme Court in State of Jharkhand and others Vs Jitendra Kumar Srivastava and one other to state that pension and post retiral benefits were not bounties but a property under Article 300A, which cannot be taken away without specific provisions of law.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

TechnologyTCS shares trade lower after it announces to layoff 12,200 employees

EntertainmentKaran Johar celebrates two years of Alia, Ranveer’s ‘Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani’

BusinessTCS shares trade lower after it announces to layoff 12,200 employees

BusinessNation Applauds a Small-Town Visionary

EntertainmentShamita Shetty tries partner workout, shares hilarious outcome: ‘My tiny feet gave up’

National Realted Stories

NationalHeavy rain alert in Rajasthan: Schools closed in 10 districts amid safety concerns

NationalWhen Ravan crossed the Lakshman Rekha, Lanka burned: Minister Rijiju ahead of 'Op Sindoor' debate in Parl

NationalFIR against Islamic cleric for derogatory remarks on SP MP Dimple Yadav

NationalLawmakers demand 'non-partisan, serious discussion' as LS to hold debate on 'Op Sindoor'

NationalJalandhar Hospital Tragedy: Oxygen Supply Drop Leads to Death of Three Patients, Inquiry Underway