City
Epaper

Northeast Delhi violence: Court acquits man accused of vandalism due to lack of evidence

By ANI | Updated: April 29, 2022 00:05 IST

A Delhi Court on Wednesday acquitted a man accused of vandalism in a shop during the violence in Northeast Delhi's Khajoori Khas area following the lack of reliable evidence.

Open in App

A Delhi Court on Wednesday acquitted a man accused of vandalism in a shop during the violence in Northeast Delhi's Khajoori Khas area following the lack of reliable evidence.

He was booked by Delhi Police under sections related to rioting, unlawful assembly, arson and vandalism.

Additional Sessions Judge Virender Bhatt acquitted Noor Mohammad alias Noora from the charges of rioting, arson and vandalism in Bunny Bakery Shop, at Chand Bagh Pulia on February 25, 2020.

The court does not find any cogent and reliable evidence on record to hold the accused guilty of charges framed against him, the acquittal order read.

While acquitting the accused, the court observed, when an unlawful assembly or a large number of persons take part in arson or in a clash between two groups, in order to convict a person, at least two prosecution witnesses have to support and identify the role and involvement of the person concerned.

The Court observed in the order, "The manner in which Police beat constable stated to have identified Noor Mohammad alias Noora as a rioter on April 2, 2020, in the police station when he was being interrogated by the Investigation Officer (IO), appears to be absolutely doubtful and devoid of trustworthiness."

From the deposition of the IO and a sub-inspector, it is evident that the accused was not arrested on the identificatory statement of the beat constable. He was arrested in this case merely on the basis of his alleged disclosure statement recorded by the sub-inspector on March 31 2020, the court noted.

The Court said, "So far as the deposition of IO to the effect that the complainant Gyenendar Kumar also identified the accused as one of the rioters on April 2, 2020, in Police Station, is concerned, the same has not been affirmed by the complainant himself. The complainant has nowhere stated in his entire deposition that he had gone to Police Station on April 2, 2020, and had identified the accused there."

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Virender bhattGyenendar kumarDelhi CourtDelhi PoliceDelhi home department
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi on High Alert After Intelligence Inputs Warn of Possible Terror Threat

MumbaiDigital Arrest Scam in Mumbai: Retired Banker Loses Rs 40.90 Lakh to Fraudsters Posing as Delhi Police, NIA Officials

NationalDelhi: Police, MCD Demolish Over 30 Drug Peddling Spots In Baba Haridas Nagar Crackdown

NationalLuxury Obsession and Mounting Debt: Dark Secrets Behind Rahul Meena’s Role in the Delhi IRS Officer’s Daughter Murder Case

NationalDelhi IRS Officer’s Daughter Murder: Police to Conduct Psychological Analysis of Accused

National Realted Stories

NationalDewas firecracker factory blast toll rises to 5; CM Mohan Yadav visits hospitals

NationalMK Stalin urges Centre to exempt NEET-UG for 2026-2027, allow state govts to make admissions

NationalBihar: Spice trader shot dead during blackout in Patna, probe on

NationalPetrol crosses Rs 107 mark, diesel above Rs 93 in Jaipur after Centre hikes fuel prices by Rs 3 per litre

NationalPM's Vision: Twenty lakh students to receive technical training by 2030, Muslim girls expected to benefit significantly