City
Epaper

Plea in SC seeks modification in IPC sections related to sexual harassment against transgenders

By ANI | Updated: September 26, 2020 15:35 IST

A petition has been filed before the Supreme Court seeking directions to the Central government to make appropriate modification/ interpretation of Sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) dealing with sexual assaults against transgender, transsexuals or eunuchs.

Open in App

A petition has been filed before the Supreme Court seeking directions to the Central government to make appropriate modification/ interpretation of Sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) dealing with sexual assaults against transgender, transsexuals or eunuchs.

The plea, filed by advocate Reepak Kansal, sought that appropriate orders and or directions be made to the Union of India to make the laws pertaining to sexual harassment gender-neutral.

The matter is likely to come up for hearing before the apex court in a week.

The petitioner, who is a practising lawyer at the Supreme Court, pleaded that the top court should direct the Central government to pass an anti-discrimination bill that penalises discrimination and harassment on the basis of gender.

The Central government should adopt and implement the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to protect the fundamental rights of the third gender by giving them equal protection under the law, the petition said.

It challenged the constitutional validity of various clauses and sub-sections of Section 354-A (Sexual harassment and punishment for sexual harassment) of the IPC.

Indian laws are for men and women and therefore, keeping in view and considering transgender neither men nor women, they generally could not get justice from the authorities due to lack of law. The third gender, are being deprived of many of the rights and privileges, which other persons enjoy as citizens of this country, the plea said.

"The State cannot discriminate against them on the ground of gender, violating Articles 14 to 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Article 14 states that the state shall not deny to "any person" equality before the law or equal protection of the law," it added.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Reepak kansalUnion Of IndiaSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiDevendra Fadnavis Disagrees with Abrupt Closure of Mumbai’s Kabutarkhanas, Urges Regulated Measures to Mitigate Health Risks

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

National Realted Stories

NationalRate cut likely in next RBI MPC meet amid global developments: Morgan Stanley

NationalOver 7 lakh persons rehabilitated from drug de-addiction centres in 2024-25: Union Minister

National78 pc of seats in India’s trains are non-AC to facilitate travel for poor: Vaishnaw

NationalSIR cannot be discussed as the matter is sub-judice: Kiren Rijiju in LS

NationalFlood fury in Bihar's Muzaffarpur, Saran; villages submerged, connectivity snapped