City
Epaper

Relatives of deceased in Malegaon 2008 case write to Mukul Rohatgi not to appear for Lt Colonel Purohit

By ANI | Published: January 06, 2021 7:46 PM

The relatives of the deceased in the Malegaon 2008 bomb blast case objected to the appearance of Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi who appeared for accused Lt Colonel Purohit.

Open in App

The relatives of the deceased in the Malegaon 2008 bomb blast case objected to the appearance of Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi who appeared for accused Lt Colonel Purohit.

Father, mother, wife and brother of six diseased sent letter to Mukul Rohatgi to not appear for accused as earlier he appeared against him as Attorney General of India.

Pursuant to the letter, Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi did not appear citing the reason, Advocate Neela informed the division bench that because of the letter, Mukul is not appearing for Colonel Purohit in this matter. The matter has been posted to 2nd February 2021.

The letter from the relatives to Rohatgi read, "I write to you with great hope that in order to prevent the miscarriage of justice, you will not appear on behalf of the accused number 9 Colonel Purohit in Criminal Writ petition 1726 of 2020 pending for hearing in the Bombay High Court."

"In the explosion of 29 September, 2008 at Malegaon all of us lost our loved sons. The Courts remain our last hope of receiving justice against the cowardly acts which not only created havoc in our lives but also claimed the lives of our loved ones," it read.

"The reason for writing this letter is as follows, You have appeared for the Union of India and the National Investigating Agency in Criminal Writ petition no 157 of 2015 on 21.09.2015. Further in 2016 while probing the bomb blast, the NIA asked the law ministry to seek your opinion in your capacity as the then-Attorney General regarding the applicability of Maharashtra Control of Orgzed Crime Act against petitioner Lt Col. Prasad Purohit and others," the letter read.

"Under these circumstances, we are of the opinion that your appearance on behalf of the accused number 9 will be in conflict of interest and will create prejudice to the whole proceedings," it read.

"In order to preserve the value of fair trial and uphold the sanctity of the position that you once held as Attorney general of India, we request you to not appear for the accused number 9," the letter added.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Virendra Prasad PurohitindiamalegaonBombay High CourtUnion Of IndiaMukul RohatgiJustice of bombay high courtBombay highIndiUk-indiaRepublic of india
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraMalegaon: Eight-Year-Old Girl Found Dead in Well, Residents Demand Justice

HealthGlobal Heatwave-Linked Deaths Surpass 1.53 Lakh Annually, India Tops Fatalities: Study

NationalLok Sabha Election 2024: I.N.D.I.A Bloc To Form Next Government on June 4, Says Mallikarjun Kharge

TechnologyIndia Leads Asia Pacific in Data Center Capacity Surpassing Australia, Japan, Hong Kong

InternationalUnited Nations Humanitarian Aid Worker Killed in Gaza Identified As Waibhav Anil Kale From India

National Realted Stories

National10 years of Modi govt's rule benefited farmers: Punjab BJP chief

NationalMoney laundering case: ED files charge sheet against Atiq Ahmed’s wife

NationalNIA files charge sheet against 10th accused in J&K drone weapon dropping case

NationalNSCN-IM refutes NIA’s claim of supporting banned outfits in Manipur

NationalTN: Panchayat president arrested for taking bribe from contractor