City
Epaper

SC adjourns for 4 weeks pleas against denying Assam inner-line permit

By ANI | Updated: August 31, 2020 15:25 IST

The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned for four weeks hearing on the pleas of two Assam students' unions challenging the Presidential order amending the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation, 1873, to deny the state an inner-line permit (ILP) system to insulate it from the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned for four weeks hearing on the pleas of two Assam students' unions challenging the Presidential order amending the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation, 1873, to deny the state an inner-line permit (ILP) system to insulate it from the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).

A bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice of India SA Bobde, adjourned the matter after Attorney General KK Venugopal sought adjournment stating that the Central government was having a comprehensive re-look at the law and required some time.

"We want to hear this matter. Even in the Kashmir issue, the same point was involved. Please reconsider your decision. We were going to do that in the final hearing also," CJI Bobde said adjourning the matter.

The apex court had earlier issued notice to the Centre and sought its response on the matter.

The ILP regime is applicable under the BEFR, 1873. In terms of Section 2 of the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulations (BEFR), 1873, citizens of other states require ILP for visiting these states. There is also protection for the locals with regards to land, jobs and other facilities.

The All Tai Ahom Students' Union' and Asom Jatiyatabadi Yuba Chatra Parishad have challenged the presidential order of December 11, 2019, to amend the BEFR terming it "unconstitutional".

The plea said that the President passed the order for amendment under Article 372 (2) of the Constitution, although as per Article 372 (3), he has the power to do so for only three years from the date of enactment of the Constitution, that is till 1953.

The students' unions have sought an inner-line system in the state to protect them from the effect of CAA especially from those who have come from Bangladesh. They want the implementation of ILP saying that under the BEFR, it was very much prevalent in some undivided districts.

According to the plea, filed by 'All Tai Ahom Students' Union', the President by exercising the power under Article 372 (2) of the Constitution has removed Kamrup, Darrang, Nowgong, Sibsagar, Lakhimpur and Cachar, which forms the part of almost entire Assam presently, from the purview of the BEFR, exactly one day prior to giving assent to the CAA.

The main objective of the ILP system is to prevent settlement of other Indian nationals in the states in order to protect the indigenous population.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: SivasagarBengal eastern frontier regulationKk VenugopalSupreme CourtLakhimpurKheri
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls as Supreme Court Postpones AGR Dues Hearing to Oct 6

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls By 6% Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing On Rs, 9450 Crore AGR Dues

NationalDelhi Metro Tragedy: Woman Falls or Jumps From Supreme Court Station; Investigation Underway

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 1%: Telecom Stock Jumps 15% in One Month After Government Signals Support on AGR Dues

NationalSupreme Court Rejects Jacqueline Fernandez’s Plea to Dismiss Rs 215 Crore Money Laundering Charges Linked to Sukesh Chandrashekhar

National Realted Stories

NationalAction against Sonam Wangchuk based on credible inputs & documents: Ladakh Admin

NationalBihar businessman in Bengal to visit Durga Puja shot dead

National‘Mentor to generations of scribes’: PM Modi condoles passing of veteran journalist ML Kotru

NationalArvind Sharma appointed new Madhya Pradesh principal secretary

NationalUttarakhand journalist’s death: Probe deepens as family alleges foul play