City
Epaper

SC agrees to hear pleas related to Article 370 in July

By ANI | Updated: April 25, 2022 14:10 IST

The Supreme Court on Monday said it will list petitions for a hearing challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir in the month of July.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Monday said it will list petitions for a hearing challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir in the month of July.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana said it will try to list a bunch of petitions challenging the validity of the law in the month of July.

Senior advocates P Chidambaram and Shekhar Naphade mentioned the petitions before the court for early hearing.

"This is the Article 370 matter... the delimitation is also going on," Naphade told the bench.

"Let me see after vacation. This is a five-judge matter. Give details we will list them. There are some issues with judges and bench composition," the CJI said.

Various petitions are pending before the top court challenging the validity of the law scrapping Article 370 of the constitution and special status to Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcating the state into two Union Territories.

Later, some petitions were filed against the government's action for delimitation in accordance with the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019.

These petitions said sweeping changes are being brought by the Centre that impacts the rights of a large number of people.

"Despite the fact that the petition is pending before the Supreme Court since 2019, the central government has taken some irreversible actions," petitions says.

Petitions have stated the Centre has constituted a delimitation commission to mark boundaries in the territory for all the constituencies before an assembly election can be held.

On August 5 2019, the Central government announced its decision to revoke the special status of Jammu and Kashmir granted under Article 370 and split the region into two Union territories.

A five-judge Bench in March 2020 had declined to refer to a larger 7-judge bench a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Centre's decision to abrogate provisions of Article 370 on August 5, saying there were no reasons to refer the matter to a larger bench.

A number of petitions have been filed in the top court including those of private individuals, lawyers, activists and politicians and political parties challenging the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which splits Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories -- Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Shekhar naphadejammuunionSupreme CourtCJIRajouri poonch rangeSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiDevendra Fadnavis Disagrees with Abrupt Closure of Mumbai’s Kabutarkhanas, Urges Regulated Measures to Mitigate Health Risks

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

National Realted Stories

NationalBihar Horror: Man Sets House on Fire in Katihar, Minor Dies, Father Battles for Life

NationalPolice in Bengal propose alternative places for protest rally led by R.G. Kar victim's parents

NationalWater leakage loss increased from 30 to 40 pc under AAP govt: Delhi Water Minister

National'False and fabricated': Defence Ministry denies reports of India pausing US arms talks

NationalIIT Delhi's new method to cut textile waste, recycle discarded denims to good quality garments