City
Epaper

SC agrees to list plea challenging Article 370 abrogation after Dussehra break

By ANI | Updated: September 23, 2022 12:30 IST

The Supreme Court on Friday said that it will list the matter-- challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories-- for hearing after the Dussehra break.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Friday said that it will list the matter-- challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories-- for hearing after the Dussehra break.

"We will certainly list it," said a bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) UU Lalit.

The Dussehra break will remain from October 3 to October 9.

The counsel mentioning the matter for urgent listing told the bench that this matter has been pending for a year.

Earlier, former CJI NV Ramana had said that he will try to list in July a bunch of petitions challenging the validity of the law scrapping Article 370.

Various petitions are pending before the top court that challenges the validity of the law scrapping Article 370 of the Constitution and special status to Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcating the state into two Union Territories.

Later, some petitions were filed against the government's action for delimitation in accordance with the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019.

These petitions alleged that sweeping changes are being brought about by the Centre that has impacted the rights of a large number of people. Despite the fact that the petition is pending before the Supreme Court since 2019, the central government has taken some irreversible actions, the petitions added.

The petitions stated that the Centre has constituted a delimitation commission to mark boundaries in the territory for all the constituencies before an assembly election can be held.

On August 5, 2019, the Central government announced its decision to revoke the special status of Jammu and Kashmir granted under Article 370 and split the region into two Union territories.

A five-judge bench in March 2020 had declined to refer to a larger 7-judge bench- a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Centre's decision to abrogate provisions of Article 370 on August 5, saying that there were no reasons to refer the matter to a larger bench.

A number of petitions have been filed in the top court including those of private individuals, lawyers, activists and politicians and political parties challenging the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which split Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories -- Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Cji nv ramanajammuunionSupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelRajouri poonch range
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls as Supreme Court Postpones AGR Dues Hearing to Oct 6

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls By 6% Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing On Rs, 9450 Crore AGR Dues

MumbaiMumbai: Gangster Wanted in Jammu Arrested by Crime Branch in Bandra, Sent to J&K Police

NationalDelhi Metro Tragedy: Woman Falls or Jumps From Supreme Court Station; Investigation Underway

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 1%: Telecom Stock Jumps 15% in One Month After Government Signals Support on AGR Dues

National Realted Stories

NationalBJP delegation to visit Karur, to probe stamped incident and meet victim families

NationalOdisha CM wishes people on Durga Puja, calls for harmony and peaceful celebrations

NationalGovt always open to dialogue on Ladakh with Leh Apex Body, Kargil Alliance: MHA

NationalHeavy rains, floods batter north Karnataka; CM Siddaramaiah plans aerial survey

NationalAmid festive season, Bengal BJP chief is busy with two key organisational assignments