City
Epaper

SC asks Parliament to consider amending Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita's provisions on matrimonial cruelty

By IANS | Updated: May 3, 2024 22:05 IST

New Delhi, May 3 The Supreme Court on Friday urged the Parliament to consider making necessary changes in ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 3 The Supreme Court on Friday urged the Parliament to consider making necessary changes in the provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, providing punishment to the husband and his family for inflicting any cruelty on a married woman.

A bench, headed by Justice J.B. Pardiwala said that Sections 85 and 86 of the new penal code, which is to come into force with effect from July 1, are nothing but verbatim reproduction of Section 498A of the IPC, 1860 and the issue requires a relook by the legislature taking into consideration the pragmatic realities.

"The only difference is that the Explanation to Section 498A of the IPC is now by way of a separate provision, i.e., Section 86 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023," it said.

The bench, also comprising Justice Manoj Misra, said that the apex court more than a decade ago had urged a serious relook of the entire provision of matrimonial cruelty by the legislation.

The Supreme Court was considering a special leave petition against an order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court which had declined to quash the charge sheet filed against a husband for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 406, 498A, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The FIR lodged by the wife alleged that the husband and his family members had demanded dowry and caused mental and physical trauma to her.

Further, she stated that her husband is an alcoholic and used to regularly beat her and treat her inhumanely.

In its order, the apex court noted that the plain reading of the FIR and the charge sheet papers indicate that the allegations levelled are quite vague, general and sweeping, specifying no instances of criminal conduct. It said that if a person is made to face a criminal trial on some general and sweeping allegations without bringing on record any specific instances of criminal conduct, the same is nothing but an abuse of the process of the court.

"We have reached the conclusion that if the criminal proceedings are allowed to continue against the appellant (husband), the same will be nothing short of an abuse of process of law & travesty of justice…(The proceedings) pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Hisar are hereby quashed," it added.

The Supreme Court ordered its registry to send a copy of the judgment to the Union Law Secretary and Union Home Secretary, who may place it before the Union Minister for Law and Justice as well as the Union Home Minister.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Cricket"The way Vaibhav batted in powerplay made difference": Patidar credits Sooryavanshi after RCB's 6-wicket loss to RR

Other SportsFormer Indian shuttler Kavita Dixit praises Women's Reservation Bill move, calls it step toward equality

EntertainmentFolk singer Mame Khan shares pics with Ranveer Singh, Aryan Khan from Anant Ambani's birthday celebrations

NationalTPCC President Mahesh Kumar Goud slams BJP over OBC exclusion in Census 2027

Other SportsPT Usha says Commonwealth Sport delegation "very happy" with Ahmedabad's for CWG 2030

National Realted Stories

NationalNDRF retrieves capsized boat from Yamuna in Mathura; 10 dead, search for missing continues

NationalECI orders repoll in Assam's Karimganj North after post-poll scrutiny of records

NationalJal Jeevan Mission scam: Retired IAS officer Subodh Agarwal produced before Court, gets 3-day police custody

National132 devotees from Ludhiana had come for 'darshan', says DM CP Singh on Mathura boat accident

NationalAI Summit protest case: Court grants interim protection to IYC member, directs him to join investigation