City
Epaper

SC dissolves bench over Vijay Madanlal Choudhary ruling on ED Powers

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: November 23, 2023 16:39 IST

On Thursday, the Supreme Court disbanded the panel formed to review a set of applications seeking a reevaluation of ...

Open in App

On Thursday, the Supreme Court disbanded the panel formed to review a set of applications seeking a reevaluation of its Vijay Madanlal Choudhary decision, which affirmed the authority of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED).

Following the Union Government's request for an extension, the special bench, consisting of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, and Bela M Trivedi, opted to postpone the hearing due to Justice Kaul's impending retirement next month. The bench has urged the Chief Justice of India to form a new bench to address the issue. The next scheduled hearing will take place in two months.

The Special Bench commenced the hearing yesterday to challenge the interpretation of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, as per the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary judgment. This ruling, issued in July 2022, affirmed the constitutional validity of various provisions within the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, including those related to arrest, seizure, presumption of innocence, and the imposition of stringent bail conditions.

According to a report of LiveLaw, Responding to Solicitor General’s request for the hearing to be deferred, Justice Kaul, alluding to his imminent retirement (on December 15), said, The problem is that I am on a deadline. I will not be able to take the burden. I have a few things to wind up before demitting office. Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, however, insisted on being granted an adjournment, saying, “A very selective reading has been done. If Your Lordships are not taken through the entirety of the act and its purpose, you may not get sufficient assistance.

He also pointed out that a coordinate bench will have to record some reasons for referring the the decision to a larger bench. Justice Trivedi also expressed similar views, saying, We have to express some views before referring this because the larger bench must have two views before it. Otherwise, it'll be very easy to refer matters. There have to be reasons. And my impression is, there’s a judgment on this, Live Law reported.

Tags: Supreme CourtDirectorate Of Enforcement
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

National Realted Stories

NationalPhilippines President Marcos begins 5-day India visit today to boost defence, trade ties

NationalCM Rekha Gupta to table two CAG reports in Delhi Assembly today during monsoon session

NationalGovt and agency should find conspirators of Malegaon bomb blast: Bhaiyaji Joshi

NationalUP Police telecom gets 1,494 new recruits as CM Yogi hands over appointment letters

NationalCM Mohan Majhi announces ex gratia for 6 Odia migrants killed in Andhra quarry blast