City
Epaper

SC imposes Rs 7,500 cost on Centre for not filing response on PIL for identifying minorities

By ANI | Updated: January 31, 2022 23:15 IST

The Supreme Court on Monday imposed a cost of Rs 7,500 on the Centre for not filing its response on a PIL seeking directions for framing of guidelines identifying minorities at the state level as Hindus are in a minority in 10 states.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Monday imposed a cost of Rs 7,500 on the Centre for not filing its response on a PIL seeking directions for framing of guidelines identifying minorities at the state level as Hindus are in a minority in 10 states.

A Bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundresh imposed the cost on the Centre was it was informed that the government has circulated a letter requesting an adjournment in the matter.

The top court expressed displeasure over the non-filing of the affidavit by the Union of India saying the government will have to "take a stand" on the issue. It granted "one further opportunity" to it.

"We grant one further opportunity of four weeks to file the counter affidavit subject to deposit of cost of Rs 7,500 to SCBA (Supreme Court Bar Association) Advocates' Welfare Fund," the Bench said while posting the matter for hearing on March 28.

On January 7, the apex court had granted the "last opportunity" to the Centre to file an affidavit within four weeks.

The plea filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay said that Hindus are minorities in ten states and are not able to avail the benefits of schemes meant for minorities.

In his plea, he has also challenged the validity of Section 2(f) of the National Commission for Minority Education Institution Act 2004 for giving unbridled power to the Centre and being manifestly arbitrary, irrational and offending.

The plea said, "Direct and declare that followers of Judaism, Bahaism and Hinduism, who are minorities in Laddakh, Mizoram, Lakshadweep, Kashmir, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Punjab and Manipur, can establish and administer educational institutions of their choice in the spirit of the TMA Pai Ruling."

The top court in the TMA Pai Foundation case had held that the state is well within its rights to introduce a regulatory regime in the national interest to provide minority educational institutions with well-qualified teachers in order for them to achieve excellence in education.

The plea added, "Rational basis of declaring certain religions as minority by Central government as they have less population in the states is contravened when benefits of schemes for minority are acquired by those religious minorities in states where they are in majority and those religious communities who are actually minorities are not been given equal status."

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtUnion Of IndiaSanjay Kishan KaulAshwini kumar upadhyay
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls as Supreme Court Postpones AGR Dues Hearing to Oct 6

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls By 6% Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing On Rs, 9450 Crore AGR Dues

NationalDelhi Metro Tragedy: Woman Falls or Jumps From Supreme Court Station; Investigation Underway

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 1%: Telecom Stock Jumps 15% in One Month After Government Signals Support on AGR Dues

NationalSupreme Court Rejects Jacqueline Fernandez’s Plea to Dismiss Rs 215 Crore Money Laundering Charges Linked to Sukesh Chandrashekhar

National Realted Stories

NationalAction against Sonam Wangchuk based on credible inputs & documents: Ladakh Admin

NationalBihar businessman in Bengal to visit Durga Puja shot dead

National‘Mentor to generations of scribes’: PM Modi condoles passing of veteran journalist ML Kotru

NationalArvind Sharma appointed new Madhya Pradesh principal secretary

NationalUttarakhand journalist’s death: Probe deepens as family alleges foul play