City
Epaper

SC issues notice on plea to transfer funds from PM CARES to NDR Fund

By IANS | Updated: June 17, 2020 20:35 IST

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice to the Centre on a PIL seeking to transfer funds from PM ...

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice to the Centre on a PIL seeking to transfer funds from PM CARES Fund to National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF).

A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.R. Shah asked the Centre to file a response within four weeks. The Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) in the plea claimed that in the backdrop of Covid-19 pandemic, NDRF is not being utilized by the authorities, and establishing the PM CARES Fund is outside the scope of the Disaster Management Act.

The petitioner argued that the entire fund collected in the PM CARES Fund to date may be directed to be transferred to the NDRF.

"The Centre may be directed to utilize NDRF for the purpose of providing assistance in the fight against Covid-19 pandemic in compliance with Section 46 of the DM Act, all the contributions/grants from individuals and institutions shall be credited to the NDRF in terms of Section 46(1)(b) rather than to PM CARES Fund and all the funds collected in the PM Cares Fund to date may be directed to be transferred to the NDRF", said the PIL.

The petition argued that there is need to put in place a broader and well- thought out national plan outlining inter alia a detailed coordination mechanism between Centre and states.

"Section 11 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the "DM Act") makes it mandatory for a national plan to be drawn up for disaster management for whole of the country, but currently, there is no such national plan in place to deal with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic", argued the plea.

The petitioner also cited lack of transparency associated with PM CARES Fund, as it cannot be audited by CAG. And, it is also outside the purview of RTI, added the plea.

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the petitioner, argued before the bench that the plea was not against the government, instead the petitioner is seeking assistance from the government.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed Dave's argument seeking issuance of notice on the plea.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Centre for Public Interest LitigationSanjay Kishan KaulSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

MumbaiMumbai: Retired Bank Manager, Family Held in ‘Digital Arrest’ for 35 Days; ₹1.83 Crore Lost to Cyber Fraud in Mulund

InternationalDonald Trump's Global Tariffs Illegal : US Supreme Court Deals Major Blow to President

EntertainmentNeeraj Pandey Drops ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ Title; Supreme Court Closes Case

InternationalRamadan 2026 Moon Sighting in Saudi Arabia: Supreme Court of KSA Calls on Muslims to Search for Crescent on THIS Date

National Realted Stories

NationalWorld Health Day: PM Modi extends greetings, expresses gratitude to healthcare workers

NationalHigh-tech response: Robot, 4 fire engines contain midnight fire in Rangareddy

NationalTwo children killed, woman injured in bomb attack in Manipur’s Bishnupur

NationalJ-K: Labour Department holds awareness camp in Sarya under Vibrant Village initiative

NationalAmaravati now sole capital of Andhra Pradesh; CM thanks President Murmu, PM Modi