City
Epaper

SC issues notice to Centre, EC on PIL seeking voting rights for prisoners

By IANS | Updated: October 31, 2022 16:35 IST

New Delhi, Oct 31 The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Oct 31 The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission (EC) on a PIL challenging the vires of Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which deprives prisoners of their right to vote.

A bench headed by Chief Justice U.U. Lalit and comprising Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Bela M. Trivedi considered the submissions made by advocate Zoheb Hossain and sought response from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and the poll panel.

The plea was filed in 2019 by Aditya Prasanna Bhattacharya, then a student of the National Law University, challenging the Constitutional validity of section 62(5) of the Act.

The plea contended that the provision, uses the yardstick of confinement in a prison to disenfranchise persons and this, coupled with the use of excessively broad language, causes the provision to generate several anomalous and shocking consequences.

"In addition to convicts who have been sentenced to a particular period of imprisonment, even under-trials, whose innocence or guilt has not been conclusively determined, are deprived of their right to vote, as they too are confined in prison, although they have not been sentenced to imprisonment," said the plea.

After hearing submissions, the top court scheduled the matter for further hearing on December 29.

The plea argued that due to the excessively broad language used by the provision, even those detained in civil prison are deprived of their right to vote. Thus, there is no reasonable classification based on the purpose of the imprisonment, it added.

"The impugned provision operates in the nature of a blanket ban, as it lacks any kind of reasonable classification based on the nature of the crime committed or the duration of the sentence imposed (unlike several other jurisdictions such as South Africa, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Greece, Canada, et al). This lack of classification is anathema to the fundamental right to equality under Article 14," said the plea.

The plea sought a direction that Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, as being ultra vires of the Constitution for being violative of the fundamental right to equality under Article 14 and the constitutional right to vote under Article 326, and therefore read it down to ensure conformity with the Constitution. It further sought direction to the Election Commission of India to take all necessary steps to give effect to the right to vote for prisoners.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Zoheb hossainAditya prasanna bhattacharyaNew DelhiSupreme CourtSouth AfricaElection CommissionThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westNew-delhiSeveral supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls as Supreme Court Postpones AGR Dues Hearing to Oct 6

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls By 6% Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing On Rs, 9450 Crore AGR Dues

NationalDelhi Metro Tragedy: Woman Falls or Jumps From Supreme Court Station; Investigation Underway

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 1%: Telecom Stock Jumps 15% in One Month After Government Signals Support on AGR Dues

NationalSupreme Court Rejects Jacqueline Fernandez’s Plea to Dismiss Rs 215 Crore Money Laundering Charges Linked to Sukesh Chandrashekhar

National Realted Stories

NationalVijay Malhotra will continue to inspire BJP workers: MP CM

NationalBovine Smuggling: J&K Police Seize Modified Oil Tanker, Rescue 20 Animals in Udhampur (Watch Video)

NationalKarur stampede could have been averted if larger venue was allotted: Hema Malini

NationalAchieving 30 pc clean air targets can reduce nationwide disease prevalence

NationalUGC issues notices to 54 private varsities for failing to disclose mandatory information