City
Epaper

SC reserves order on plea of death row convict, who claims to be kept in solitary confinement

By ANI | Updated: April 29, 2022 00:05 IST

The Supreme Court reserved the judgement on a petition of a death row convict challenging the Karnataka High Court order which dismissed his plea challenging the executability of his death sentence, pursuant to the rejection of his mercy petition filed before the President.

Open in App

The Supreme Court reserved the judgement on a petition of a death row convict challenging the Karnataka High Court order which dismissed his plea challenging the executability of his death sentence, pursuant to the rejection of his mercy petition filed before the President.

The convict has claimed to be kept in solitary confinement right from the decision of the Sessions Court awarding him the death sentence.

A bench of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha reserved the order on convict BA Umesh's plea.

According to advocate Yug Mohit Chaudhry, appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner was kept in solitary confinement right from the decision of the Sessions Court awarding him a death sentence.

A case was registered against Umesh on February 28, 1998 by Peenya Police under Sections 376 (rape) 302 (murder) and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. On October 27, 2006 the Sessions Court passed the sentence of death against the petitioner. On February 18. 2009 Karnataka High Court supported the imposition of the death sentence. On February 1, 2011, the Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's appeal and upheld the sentence of the death penalty passed on the petitioner.

On February 8, 2011, the petitioner's mother filed a mercy petition before the President, which was rejected on May 12, 2013.

Counsel of the petitioner had argued before Karnataka High Court that there has been an excessive and unexplained delay of 2 years and 3 months and 7 days, that is 827 days, in adjudicating the mercy petition thereby causing unnecessary and avoidable pain, suffering, and mental torment which is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Karnataka Government has opposed the submission that the accused has been kept insolitary confinement in jail.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Yug mohit chaudhryKarnataka High CourtSupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls as Supreme Court Postpones AGR Dues Hearing to Oct 6

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls By 6% Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing On Rs, 9450 Crore AGR Dues

NationalDelhi Metro Tragedy: Woman Falls or Jumps From Supreme Court Station; Investigation Underway

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 1%: Telecom Stock Jumps 15% in One Month After Government Signals Support on AGR Dues

NationalSupreme Court Rejects Jacqueline Fernandez’s Plea to Dismiss Rs 215 Crore Money Laundering Charges Linked to Sukesh Chandrashekhar

National Realted Stories

NationalDelhi BMW accident: Court to hear accused Gaganpreet Kaur’s bail plea today

NationalHM Shah to hold key BJP strategy meetings in Araria, Saran, and Vaishali today

NationalPM Modi to unveil major Odisha projects worth over Rs 60,000 cr in Jharsuguda today

NationalTrump’s pharma tariffs won’t impact India for now, says expert

NationalIn trade talks with US, India pushes for less than 20 per cent tariff rate: Sources