City
Epaper

SC to hear plea against blocking 4PM YouTube channel on Tuesday

By IANS | Updated: May 10, 2025 17:17 IST

New Delhi, May 10 The Supreme Court is slated to hear on Tuesday a plea filed by journalist ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 10 The Supreme Court is slated to hear on Tuesday a plea filed by journalist Sanjay Sharma challenging the directive to block the YouTube channel 4PM News Network on the grounds of "national security" and "public order".

As per the causelist published on the website of the apex court, a bench of Justices BR Gavai and AG Masih will resume hearing the matter on May 13. On Monday, the Justice Gavai-led Bench issued a notice and sought responses from the Union government, including the Ministry of Home Affairs, and YouTube.

In the previous hearing, when a prayer for interim relief was pressed, the top court told senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the petitioner, that it was not inclined to pass any interim order without hearing the other side.

In his writ petition filed before the apex court, the editor of the digital news platform said that non-furnishing of the blocking order or underlying complaint violated both statutory and constitutional safeguards. "Rules 8, 9, and 16 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009, which permit blocking without notice or hearing, are violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), and 21 of the Constitution, as they oust the principles of natural justice and enable a shadow regime of censorship devoid of transparency or accountability," stated the petition filed through Talha Abdul Rahman.

Further, it said that the Constitution does not permit the blanket removal of content without an opportunity to be heard. "'National security' and 'public order' are not talismanic invocations to insulate executive action from scrutiny. They are constitutionally recognised grounds under Article 19(2), but are subject to the test of reasonableness and proportionality,” the plea said.

A vague reference to these grounds, without even disclosing the offending content, makes it impossible for the petitioner to challenge or remedy the allegation, thereby depriving him of his fundamental right to free speech and fair hearing, added the petition.

The Editors Guild of India, in a recent press statement, said that it was “deeply concerned” by the decision of the Union government to block YouTube Channel 4PM News Network, and termed the move an "opaque use of executive power, without prior notice or opportunity for response". "Arbitrary takedown orders undermine the fundamental right to freedom of speech. [T]he Guild reiterates its demand for a transparent and accountable mechanism for content takedowns, particularly when it concerns journalistic work. National security cannot become a pretext to silence critical voices or independent reporting," added the press statement.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIDF strikes over 35 Hamas targets in Beit Hanoun

InternationalIDF, Shin Bet eliminate senior terror operative in Lebanon

InternationalFamilies' forum expresses concern over stalled talks in Doha

CricketI dream of playing shots like that: Rahul expresses his admiration for Pant

Cricket"Lot of us got starts, and we couldn't convert it": KL Rahul as India falls short of taking lead against England

National Realted Stories

NationalMangaluru: Two Workers Die After Inhaling Toxic Gas During Routine Inspection at MRPL

NationalTwo-day police conference in Jaipur to check human trafficking

NationalCongress flags five key objections to Special Intensive Revision in Bihar

NationalCare of senior citizens is the community's responsibility: Delhi Speaker Vijender Gupta

NationalNavi Mumbai International Airport must be completed by Sep 30: Maha CM