City
Epaper

SC upholds Kerala HC decision of RSS member's 'locus standi' for complaint against its defamation

By ANI | Updated: March 26, 2022 14:35 IST

The Supreme Court has upheld the Kerala High Court decision wherein it was held that any member of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has the 'locus standi' to maintain a complaint against organization's defamation.

Open in App

The Supreme Court has upheld the Kerala High Court decision wherein it was held that any member of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has the 'locus standi' to maintain a complaint against organization's defamation.

A bench of justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Aniruddha Bose in its March 25 order refused to entertain a petition challenging a Kerala High Court order.

"Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the record, we do not find any reason to entertain this petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The petition seeking special leave to appeal is, accordingly, dismissed," the top court said.

Kerala High Court has recently held that any member of RSS has the 'locus standi' to maintain a complaint against the organization's defamation.

"Since RSS is a definite and identifiable body as held by the High Court of Allahabad and asserted by the Apex Court vide decisions cited supra, the contention of the petitioners that the first respondent has no locus standi to maintain a complaint under Section 500 of Indian Penal Code is not tenable. So this is liable to be dismissed," the Kerala High Court had ruled.

The Kerala High Court had directed the trial court to expedite the trial and to dispose of the case, in accordance with the law, without any further.

The High Court was hearing a plea filed by the accused in a defamation case seeking to quash entire proceedings in the case before an Ernakulam Court.

The complaint was initiated against Mathrubhoomi Illustrated Weekly, on a private complaint filed by the Kerala State Secretary of the RSS, alleging offences punishable under Sections 120B, 153A, 500 read with Section 34 of IPC.

The complainant has alleged that an article written published by Mathrubhoomi weekly contained imputations, which were defamatory and misleading, lowering the reputation of RSS in the public.

"When the association was a determinate and an identifiable body, the defamatory words used against that association could be treated as defamation of the individuals who composed it. So, any member of that association can maintain a complaint under Section 500 of IPC," the Kerala High Court had said.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: indiaboseKerala High CourtSupreme CourtDinesh MaheshwariIndiUk-indiaRepublic of indiaIndia indiaGia india
Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIranian President Calls for Constructive Role of Brics to Halt West Asia Conflict During Talks With PM Modi

LifestyleEid 2026 Date: When Will Saudi Arabia, UAE and India Celebrate Eid-ul-Fitr?

MaharashtraMaharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Unfurls 200-Foot National Flag at Nagpur’s Kasturchand Park

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

NationalAhmedabad Traffic Update for India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup Final: Check Road Closures and Alternate Routes Near Narendra Modi Stadium

National Realted Stories

NationalGujarat: BJP holds 'silent protest' in Ahmedabad over Kharge’s ‘illiterate’ remark

NationalManipur blast: CM chairs all-party meet; leaders assure full cooperation to govt

NationalK’taka love jihad case: Pralhad Joshi visits Hubballi victim’s family

NationalNo gas shortage behind industrial unit closures in Morbi, Surendranagar: Gujarat officials

NationalHimachal Police organises art exhibition at Gaiety Theatre, carries message against drug abuse