City
Epaper

Wearing of masks cannot be made an ego issue, says Delhi HC

By ANI | Published: April 07, 2021 3:33 PM

Dismissing all the four petitions challenging impositions of challans for not wearing a mask amid the pandemic, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday suggested that wearing of masks cannot be made an "ego" issue.

Open in App

Dismissing all the four petitions challenging impositions of challans for not wearing a mask amid the pandemic, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday suggested that wearing of masks cannot be made an "ego" issue.

The court held that wearing masks is compulsory even if a person is driving alone in a car and stated that mask act as a "Suraksha Kavach", which would prevent the spread of the deadly virus adding that, "even if a car is occupied by just one person, it is a public space."

"Compliance by advocates and lawyers would encourage the general public to show greater inclination to comply. The duty of advocates and lawyers is of a greater magnitude, especially in the context of the pandemic for enforcement of directives, measures and guidelines issued under the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and the Disaster Management Act, 2005," the court said.

The court also noted that all the four petitioners in these cases, being lawyers ought to recognise and assist in the implementation of measures to contain the pandemic, rather than questioning the same. "Advocates as a class, owing to their legal training have a higher duty to show compliance especially in extenuating circumstances such as the pandemic," the bench said.

The court also emphasised the need to wear masks when around with senior citizens and people with comorbidities and stating that several experts, doctors and researchers had emphasised the need to wear masks. Even masks should be worn even when a person is vaccinated, the court added.

Earlier, the Delhi Government in the same matter had told the Delhi High Court that any person moving around in his personal or official vehicle must be wearing masks. The government in its affidavit had submitted that guidelines are very clear cut that any person moving around in his personal or official vehicle must be wearing masks compulsorily.

All "public places", and a personal vehicle falls in the said category and cannot be said to be a "private zone" as contended by the petitioner in the instant case," the state government said.

The court was hearing a petition that sought a refund of Rs 500 fine and compensation of Rs 10 lakh for publicly causing mental harassment.According to petitioner Saurabh Sharma, on September 9, Delhi Police issued a challan of Rs 500 for not wearing a mask even though he was alone in the car while driving to work.

The petitioner argued that the Department of Delhi Disaster Management Authority guidelines only states that the mask has to be worn in a public place or place of work.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Delhi High CourtDelhi GovernmentSaurabh SharmaDelhi delhi high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi High Court Seeks CBI and ED Response on Manish Sisodia’s Bail Plea in Alleged Excise Policy Scam

PoliticsExcise Policy Case: Delhi HC Allows AAP's Manish Sisodia to Meet His Ailing Wife Once A Week

NationalManish Sisodia Moves Delhi HC Seeking Bail in Excise Policy Case

NationalDelhi High Court Rejects Plea To Disqualify PM Narendra Modi From Contesting Elections

NationalDelhi HC Raps Arvind Kejriwal Government for Failing to Distribute Books to MCD Schools

National Realted Stories

NationalOver 30 LS seats from Bengal assured this time, says Home Minister Amit Shah

NationalBJP will transform growth trajectory of Odisha: PM Modi

NationalAkhilesh appoints Shyam Lal Pal as new state president of SP

NationalManipur: Educational institutions close for two days after heavy rains, hailstorm

NationalLok Sabha Election 2024: Former Haryana CM Manohar Lal Khattar Files Nomination From Karnal Seat