City
Epaper

Tripura communal violence: SC allows petitioner to file rejoinder on govt's response

By IANS | Published: January 24, 2022 7:30 PM

New Delhi, Jan 24 The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the petitioner, seeking probe into recent communal violence ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 24 The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the petitioner, seeking probe into recent communal violence in Tripura, to file a rejoinder to the state government's response,which urged the court to dismiss the plea.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing advocate Ehtesham Hashmi, submitted before a bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud that "C" grade TV channels indulge in such whataboutery, but this is not expected from a state government in such a sensitive case of communal violence.

The Tripura government, in an affidavit, had asked why public-spirited citizens who filed PIL, were silent on West Bengal violence. Citing the state's response, Bhushan said this does not show it in a good light.

After hearing arguments, the bench, also comprising Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, asked the petitioner to give their rejoinder in the matter and scheduled the matter for further hearing on January 31.

The Tripura government said: "No individuals or group of individuals professionally functioning as public-spirited persons can selectively invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court to achieve some apparent but undisclosed motive." It also claimed that allegations against it started with planted and pre-planned articles in tabloids.

The state government further added that these people were selectively outraged with it, though they remained silent on large-scale post-poll violence, which occurred in West Bengal.

On November 29, the top court issued notice on a plea seeking independent SIT probe into the communal violence in Tripura. The plea has been filed by Hashmi, through Bhushan has arrayed Centre, the DGP, Tripura, and the TripuraAgovernment as respondents.

The plea claimed that between October 13 and October 27, last year, hate crimes were perpetrated in Tripura by organised mobs. "These included damage to mosques, burning of business establishments owned by Muslims, organising rallies shouting Islamophobic and genocidal hate slogans and delivering hate speeches targeting Muslims in various parts of Tripura," said the plea. The plea said no arrests have been made of persons who were responsible for desecrating mosques or vandalising shops and delivering hate speeches targeting the Muslim community.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtJustice d.y. chandrachudEhtesham hashmiDinesh Maheshwari
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Centre on Plea Challenging Marital Rape Exception in New Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita

NationalWife Accuses Husband of Rape for Taking Her to Afghanistan; Supreme Court Stays Proceedings

NationalSupreme Court Rejects ED Objection Over Arvind Kejriwal’s ‘Vote for AAP or Will To Go Jail on June 2’ Comment

NationalMukhtar Ansari Prayer Meet: SC Grants Abbas Ansari Permission To Attend Private Ceremony With Family

National'Arrest and Remand Illegal': Supreme Court Orders Release of NewsClick Founder Prabir Purkayastha in UAPA Case

Politics Realted Stories

PoliticsPM Modi Reacts to Potential NCP (SP) Merger with Congress: Is Sharad Pawar Nervous about Baramati?

PoliticsArvind Kejriwal Counters PM Modi’s Critique of AAP Scheme, says “Why Can’t Women Get Free Bus Rides When....?"

Politics"Whatever I Have Learnt In Politics Has Been Taught By Amethi’s People": Rahul Gandhi

PoliticsExclusive Interview of PM Narendra Modi to Rishi Darda: Congress’ Shahzada Speaking Language of Maoists

PoliticsLok Sabha Election 2024: People of Maharashtra Have Been Greatly Supportive of the NDA, Says Prime Minister Narendra Modi