Mukul Rohatgi English news | Mukul Rohatgi, Latest News & Live Updates in English | English News (Latest English News) at Lokmattimes.com

New Delhi, Jan 3 The Supreme Court on Monday junked a plea by Chhattisgarh's suspended Additional Director General of Police, Gurjinder Pal Singh, challenging the high court order, which denied him protection against arrest in a case under Prevention of Corruption Act.A bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana and comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli said: "Having heard learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and carefully perusing the material available on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur whereby the said court rejected the petitioner's application for protection against arrest and stay of further proceedings in First Information Report bearing Crime No.22/2021.""The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application filed in the matter also stands disposed of," the SC said in its order.Singh was represented by senior advocate U.R. Lalit and the Chhattisgarh government was represented by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi and advocate Sumeer Sodhi.Singh, in his plea, said: "The petitioner is preferring the special leave petition against the impugned dismissal order passed by High Court for praying the interim relief of protection against the arrest and stay in further proceedings in the quashing petition under Section 482 of CrPC for the impugned FIR in question lodged against him under Section 13 (1) (b) and 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act".On September 27, last year, the top court had told Singh's counsel then that his client cannot take protection from arrest in every case, and pointed out that things take a wrong turn when people start extracting money, as they were close to the government.However, the top court had granted him protection in two other criminal cases - sedition and extortion."When you're good with the government, you may extract... then you've to pay back with interest. This is too much, why should we grant protection to such officers?", the Chief Justice had remarked, adding that such police officers must not be protected but must be jailed.Three special leave petitions have been moved before the apex court against the Chhattisgarh High Court orders, where the court declined to quash the FIRs against Singh. A case was filed against Singh based on a written complaint by the state Anti-Corruption Bureau, based on preliminary findings that he had amassed disproportionate assets.Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Mukul RohatgiFOLLOW

Mukul rohatgi, Latest News

New Delhi, Jan 27 The Supreme Court on Thursday directed Bharatiya Janata Party's Maharashtra MLA Nitesh Rane, the ... ...

New Delhi, Jan 27 Agreeing to hear on Monday the plea filed by Shiromani Akali Dal leader Bikram ... ...

The Supreme Court refused to entertain the Kerala Government's plea seeking extension of time to complete the trial in the Malayalam actress assault case, involving actor Dileep. ...

New Delhi, Jan 13 Avantha Group promoter Gautam Thapar, who was arrested in connection with alleged misappropriation of ... ...

New Delhi, Jan 5 The Central government and the Delhi Police Commissioner Rakesh Asthana have termed the challenge ... ...

New Delhi, Jan 3 The Supreme Court on Monday junked a plea by Chhattisgarh's suspended Additional Director General ... ...