The Supreme Court English news | The Supreme Court, Latest News & Live Updates in English | English News (Latest English News) at Lokmattimes.com

New Delhi, Feb 4 The Supreme Court on Friday will hear a plea by comedian Munawar Faruqui against the Madhya Pradesh High Court order, refusing to grant him bail in a case where he allegedly hurt religious sentiments.A bench comprising Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman and B.R. Gavai will consider the appeal filed by Faruqui challenging the high court's January 28 order.The high court had observed that after taking into consideration the material seized and the statements of the witnesses along with the on-going investigation in the matter, no case is made out for grant of bail."It is the constitutional duty of every citizen of the country and also of the States to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India irrespective of religious, linguistic, regional or sectional diversities and to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture (Article 15A (e) and (f) of the Constitution", it had said.Faruqui, a resident of Gujarat, was arrested on January 2 along with four others on the allegations that he made derogatory remarks against Hindu gods during a stand-up show. The other arrested persons were identified as Edwin Anthony, Nalin Yadav, Prakhar Vyas and Priyam Vyas.The high court had noted that there is possibility of collection of more incriminating material and complacency of other persons cannot also be ruled out.Faruqui's counsel submitted before the high court that he came on an invitation from the organisers of the comedy show and was though present on the spot at the show, did not utter anything as alleged. The high court, however, said: "In the light of the statements of the complainant and the witnesses referred above, the seized articles, viz., video footage of the show and the seizure memos detailed above, at this stage it is difficult to countenance to the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant as complacency of the applicant cannot be ruled out, besides vulnerability of his acts in public domain. It is not a case of no evidence."The case was registered following complaint from Eklavya Singh Gaud against the accused. Gaud alleged that the comed were cutting filthy and indecent jokes deliberately against Hindu gods and goddesses and former BJP President, Amit Shah. As a result, the comed hurt and outraged his religious sentiments.( With inputs from IANS )Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

The Supreme CourtFOLLOW

The supreme court, Latest News

New Delhi, Feb 11 The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to entertain a plea by farmers' rights activist ... ...

New Delhi, Feb 10 The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the Union Environment Ministry to do an impact ... ...

New Delhi, Feb 9 The Supreme Court has clarified that SBI Fund Management, and not SBI Mutual Funds, ... ...

New Delhi, Feb 9 The Supreme Court on Tuesday junked a PIL seeking to declare the penal provision ... ...

New Delhi, Feb 8 The Supreme Court on Monday directed the vacant seats in the first year of ... ...

New Delhi, Feb 5 The Supreme Court said on Friday that a litigant cannot be permitted to do ... ...

New Delhi, Feb 4 The Supreme Court on Thursday made no bones about its utter dissatisfaction with the ... ...

New Delhi, Feb 4 The Supreme Court on Friday will hear a plea by comedian Munawar Faruqui against ... ...