City
Epaper

HC states DPCA cannot direct FIR registration

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: April 10, 2025 22:10 IST

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar:The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, comprising Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Rohit Joshi, observed ...

Open in App

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar:

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, comprising Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Rohit Joshi, observed that the Divisional Level Police Complaint Authority (DPCA) does not have the power to direct the registration of an FIR.

Meanwhile, the bench has instructed the Superintendent of Police (SP), Latur, not to register any FIR against the petitioner police officer based on the authority’s order dated February 21, 2025, until further orders are issued.

What is the original case?

According to the complaint filed by Balegunisa Begum Mohammad Samiyoddin Chaudhary, the issue dates back to October 21, 2020. She alleged that when she went to her field to inspect the removal of a nameplate bearing her name and boundary markers, she was molested and threatened with death. Following this, she went to the Udgir (Rural) Police Station to file a case against 18 accused persons, but the police officer on duty allegedly refused to register her complaint. Even a complaint sent via post was not accepted.

Later on, accepted the complaint after intervention of the Superintendent of Police (SP), did a primary investigation, stated the complainant to DPCA. The complainant Balegunnisa Begum named the Udgir (Rural) Police Station’s police inspector Deepak Kumar Waghmare, API R R Bhole, PSI Tanaji Cherle, PI A B Gharge and PSI Vyanket Kulkarni for not registering the complaint after the High Court’s order and assisting the accused in seeking bail.

DPCA recommends

After judicial inquiry, the DPCA holding responsible the then PI Waghmare and PSI Kulkarni recommended filing an offence against them under Section 199 of BNS. Hence the two police officers through Adv Vijay Latange challenged the order in the High Court. Latange during the hearing pointed out that DPCA failed to follow the principles of natural justice. He mentioned of discrepancies in the woman’s complaint and her statement. To support his argument, he referenced the legal precedent set in the case of "Priya Paul vs. State of Maharashtra & Others."

Open in App

Related Stories

ThaneThane Crime: 52-Year Old Man Killed in Jamburde Village Over Local Dispute

Entertainment"The summit is excellent opportunity to showcase creativity": Ashutosh Mohle on WAVES 2025

NationalTwo flyovers to be built on Delhi-Jaipur Expressway

Other SportsPremier League: Chido Obi becomes Man Utd's youngest starter in English top tier

Other SportsIPL 2025: Fiery knocks from Russell, Raghuvanshi power KKR to 206/4 against RR

Aurangabad Realted Stories

AurangabadWoman duped of ₹3.24 lakhs in job scam

AurangabadPh D conferred on Punamchandra

AurangabadGold pendant worth 30g stolen while boarding bus

AurangabadYouth found dead by hanging

AurangabadBook ‘Unhatil Chhayadar Vriksha’ release in MGM