City
Epaper

SC seeks Centre's reply on PIL for ban on disinfectant tunnels

By IANS | Updated: August 12, 2020 16:55 IST

New Delhi, Aug 12 The Supreme Court has directed the Centre to respond to a plea that sought immediate ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 12 The Supreme Court has directed the Centre to respond to a plea that sought immediate ban on the production, advertisement, installation, and use of disinfection tunnels which spray chemical disinfectants to contain the spread of Covid-19.

A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy, and MR Shah issued notice on the PIL filed by law student Gursimran Singh Narula.

The top court asked the petitioner's counsel to serve the petition's copy in the Solicitor General's office, who may obtain instructions accordingly. The top court has listed the matter for further hearing after two weeks.

The petitioner argued that in the guise of preventing COVID-19, many sanitisation and disinfection devices have come in the market that wrongfully claim to be effective in preventing the virus spread.

"These include disinfection tunnels for spraying and fumigation of disinfectants, exposing human beings to ultraviolet rays. The World Health Organisation and many other scientific authorities across the world have warned about their ineffectiveness and dangerous after-effects," the plea said.

The petitioner submitted that the WHO and health experts across the world were alarmed that the unchecked and misinformed use of such tunnels could have serious physical and psychological consequences on human beings.

The petitioner cited a statement by Pune-based Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Chemical Laboratory (CSIR-NCL) and Mumbai-based Institute of Chemical Technology (ICT) on April 24, asserting that the effectiveness of disinfectants' spray on human beings expressly cast doubts on the scientific value of an advisory issued by health authorities.

"As of today, many studies have revealed that spraying of disinfectants on human beings is becoming a common practice across the country with faulty notions of no health impact of the disinfectants," the plea added.

The petitioner claimed that this had led to violation of the right to healthy life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Gursimran singh narulaSupreme CourtWorld Health Organisation
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

MumbaiMumbai: Retired Bank Manager, Family Held in ‘Digital Arrest’ for 35 Days; ₹1.83 Crore Lost to Cyber Fraud in Mulund

InternationalDonald Trump's Global Tariffs Illegal : US Supreme Court Deals Major Blow to President

EntertainmentNeeraj Pandey Drops ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ Title; Supreme Court Closes Case

InternationalRamadan 2026 Moon Sighting in Saudi Arabia: Supreme Court of KSA Calls on Muslims to Search for Crescent on THIS Date

Health Realted Stories

HealthIndia to boost biosimilar insulin, CGM manufacturing as Global South looks for support

HealthIndia clocks unprecedented foodgrain output, boosts institutional support to farmers

HealthIndia tightens watch on GLP-1 drugs amid safety and misuse concerns

HealthIndia’s millet push receives dual boost at technology and grassroots levels

HealthUK heart rhythm expert now performing procedures in India