City
Epaper

SC seeks Centre's reply on PIL for ban on disinfectant tunnels

By IANS | Published: August 12, 2020 3:49 PM

New Delhi, Aug 12 The Supreme Court has directed the Centre to respond to a plea that sought immediate ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 12 The Supreme Court has directed the Centre to respond to a plea that sought immediate ban on the production, advertisement, installation, and use of disinfection tunnels which spray chemical disinfectants to contain the spread of Covid-19.

A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy, and MR Shah issued notice on the PIL filed by law student Gursimran Singh Narula.

The top court asked the petitioner's counsel to serve the petition's copy in the Solicitor General's office, who may obtain instructions accordingly. The top court has listed the matter for further hearing after two weeks.

The petitioner argued that in the guise of preventing COVID-19, many sanitisation and disinfection devices have come in the market that wrongfully claim to be effective in preventing the virus spread.

"These include disinfection tunnels for spraying and fumigation of disinfectants, exposing human beings to ultraviolet rays. The World Health Organisation and many other scientific authorities across the world have warned about their ineffectiveness and dangerous after-effects," the plea said.

The petitioner submitted that the WHO and health experts across the world were alarmed that the unchecked and misinformed use of such tunnels could have serious physical and psychological consequences on human beings.

The petitioner cited a statement by Pune-based Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Chemical Laboratory (CSIR-NCL) and Mumbai-based Institute of Chemical Technology (ICT) on April 24, asserting that the effectiveness of disinfectants' spray on human beings expressly cast doubts on the scientific value of an advisory issued by health authorities.

"As of today, many studies have revealed that spraying of disinfectants on human beings is becoming a common practice across the country with faulty notions of no health impact of the disinfectants," the plea added.

The petitioner claimed that this had led to violation of the right to healthy life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Gursimran singh narulaSupreme CourtWorld Health Organisation
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalArvind Kejriwal To Be Released From Jail? We May Consider Granting Interim Bail to Delhi CM, Says Supreme Court

NationalCovishield Vaccine Side Effects: Plea Filed in Supreme Court To Examine Adverse Effects of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccine

NationalReview Petitions Against Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Article 370 Abrogation Listed for Hearing On May 1st

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Why No Bail Plea in Trial Court, Supreme Court Asks CM Arvind Kejriwal

NationalSupreme Court Denies Request to Delay CA Exams Amid Lok Sabha Election 2024

Health Realted Stories

HealthObesity, poor diet & physical inactivity driving early onset of cancers: Health expert

HealthStudy calls for making cardiorespiratory fitness a part of annual check-up

HealthNew Vitamin C-rich bandage to boost burn healing

HealthStudy shows how E. coli causes urinary tract infections

NationalFSSAI Increases Pesticide Residue Limit Tenfold in Herbs and Spices