City
Epaper

Delhi HC dismisses Future's plea to end arbitration with Amazon

By IANS | Updated: January 4, 2022 22:10 IST

New Delhi, Jan 4 In a setback to the Future Group, the Delhi High Court on Tuesday dismissed ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 4 In a setback to the Future Group, the Delhi High Court on Tuesday dismissed its pleas seeking a direction to a Singapore tribunal to deal with its termination application in connection with deal with Amazon.

Justice Amit Bansal had reserved the orders on Monday after hearing on pleas filed by Future Retail Ltd (FRL) and Future Coupons Ltd (FCRL).

The Future Group moved the high court seeking direction for the Singapore tribunal to hear termination application ahead of the scheduled hearings in the arbitration case. In December last year, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) had imposed a penalty of Rs 202 crore on Amazon and suspended its approval for the e-tailer's deal with Future Coupons, a promoter firm of the group's public listed company Future Retail Ltd, seeking more information.

The Singapore tribunal had held that it could not accommodate its termination application ahead of the scheduled hearings on the main case.

Citing the CCI order, the Future Group argued the agreement which provided for the arbitration proceedings itself is rendered invalid and as such, the ongoing proceedings, too, would be irrelevant. Amazon opposed it, saying that arbitration and the underlying contract are independent of each other, and also cited legal options, such as appeals, available against the CCI order.

The CCI said that Amazon ought to have notified the combination and Future Retail (FRL) shareholding agreement for the purpose of acquisition of strategic rights over FRL through FCPL shareholders' agreement (SHA), and commercial agreements between Amazon and Future groups, for the purpose of establishing strategic alignment and partnership between Amazon Group and FRL as well as have a 'foot-in-the-door' in the India retail sector.

The CCI's order further added that given that the combination is between players who are known in the online marketplace and offline retailing, and they have contemplated strategic alignment between their businesses, the Commission considers it necessary to examine the combination afresh based on a notice to be given with true, correct and complete information, as required therein.

In 2020, Amazon invoked arbitration after Future Retail announced its asset sale deal with Reliance Industries Ltd's wholly-owned subsidiary, Reliance Retail.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: New DelhisingaporeFuture GroupDelhi High CourtAmit bansal
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraOver 10,000 Pakistani Nationals Traced in Maharashtra and Delhi Post-Palgham Terror Attack

NationalRCB Approaches Delhi High Court Against Uber Over Advertisement Featuring Travis Head

EntertainmentPawan Kalyan's 8-Year-Old Son Hospitalized in Singapore for Respiratory Issues Following Fire Accident

NationalSupreme Court Judges Unanimously Agreed To Declare Their Assets

MumbaiMumbai International Airport Sees 19% Increase in Air Traffic Towards Southeast Asia After Visa Policy Relaxation

International Realted Stories

InternationalChinmoy Krishna Das' Advocate Apurba Kumar Bhattacharjee welcomes bail decision for spiritual leader

InternationalTravesty of justice: Bangladesh SC stays High Court order granting bail to Chinmoy Das

InternationalSaudi Arabia expresses concern over "escalating tensions" between India, Pakistan; calls on both to de-escalate, work for stability & peace

InternationalBangladesh: Yunus slammed for 'implementing every design' to malign former PM Hasina

InternationalLebanese President urges stronger ceasefire oversight, calls on Israel to end violations