City
Epaper

Pegasus row: SC pulls up lawyer, says no notice for Prime Minister

By IANS | Updated: August 5, 2021 14:45 IST

New Delhi, Aug 5 The Supreme Court on Thursday pulled up advocate M.L. Sharma for making Prime Minister ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 5 The Supreme Court on Thursday pulled up advocate M.L. Sharma for making Prime Minister Narendra Modi as respondent in his petition seeking a court monitored SIT probe into the Pegasus snooping issue.

A bench comprising Chief Justice N.V. Ramana and Justice Surya Kant said: "You have included certain individuals (Prime Minister in the petition). We can't issue notice like this. Don't try to take advantage of things, you have a defective memo of parties."

Sharma had argued that the government is fabricating material in the computer through this software and made the Prime Minister and CBI as respondents in his petition.

The bench replied, "This is not the way to file a PIL, where is the material other than paper cuttings."

Sharma argued that his petition is based on facts and not merely newspaper cuttings. He also agreed to amend the parties as respondents in his petition, after the bench objected to making an individual as respondent in his petition.

During the hearing, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing N. Ram, argued that Pegasus is a rogue technology, and it is entirely illegal, as it infiltrates into our lives through telephone, and it hears and watches. Sibal emphasized that it is an assault on privacy and human dignity.

The top court noted that there are too many petitions, and it has to see on which petitions it has to issue formal notice and on which it shouldn't. The top court asked petitioners to serve copy on the Union of India and indicated that only in a few petitions, it may issue notice on Tuesday after hearing the views of the Centre.

Sharma's plea said: "The Pegasus scandal is a matter of grave concern and an attack on the Indian democracy, country's security and judiciary. The widespread use of surveillance is morally disfiguring. National security implications of this software are huge".

Insisting for a court-monitored probe, Sharma's plea contended that the scandal involves issues concerning national security and judicial independence. Several petitioners have filed in the Supreme Court seeking a court monitored probe into the Pegasus snooping issue. The top court has scheduled the matter for further hearing on Tuesday.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: cbiNew DelhiUnion Of IndiaKapil SibalNarendra ModiThe Supreme CourtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westNarendra modi modi
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSharad Pawar Commends India's Operation Sindoor, Extends Full Support to PM Modi In Fight Against Pakistan

NationalOperation Sindoor: PM Narendra Modi Calls For All-Party Meeting On May 8 After India Strikes On Pakistan Terror Camps

CricketOperation Sindoor: "No Room For Terrorism In This World": Sachin Tendulkar Supports Indian Army’s Retaliation After Pahalgam Attack

Social ViralViral Video: Snake Found Inside Train Toilet, Internet Reacts

OpinionsCaste Census, a Long-Awaited Move!"

International Realted Stories

InternationalMEA briefs UNSC members following Operation Sindoor

InternationalJapan urges India, Pakistan to exercise restraint, calls for dialogue for peace in South Asia

InternationalBangladesh closely observing situation in India, Pakistan; urges restraint

InternationalOperation Sindoor: NSA Doval engages with counterparts from US, UK, China, and Russia

InternationalAjit Doval speaks with Rubio, NSAs from several other countries after Operation Sindoor; says India's action measured, non-escalatory