City
Epaper

SC reserves verdict on Amazon's pleas challenging Future-Reliancedeal

By IANS | Published: July 29, 2021 3:54 PM

New Delhi, July 29 The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved the judgment on the pleas of e-commerce giant ...

Open in App

New Delhi, July 29 The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved the judgment on the pleas of e-commerce giant Amazon challenging the Rs 24,713 crore deal for merger of Future Retail Ltd (FRL) with Reliance Retail.

Senior advocates Harish Salve and Gopal Subramanium, appearing for FRL and Amazon respectively, concluded their submissions in the case today.

A bench comprising justices R.F. Nariman and B.R. Gavai said it will close the arguments in the matter. "The judgment is reserved", said the bench.

Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC and FRL have been locked in a better legal battle over the deal. Amazon had argued that the Singapore's Emergency Arbitrator (EA) award, which restrained FRL from going ahead with the merger, was valid and enforceable. Amazon had moved the apex court challenging the Delhi High Court's division bench order which gave a green signal to the Reliance-FRL deal.

Salve, representing FRL, contended there was no notion of EA under the Indian law on arbitration and conciliation and also, there was no arbitration agreement to this effect. He emphasized that there was no provision for EA under the Indian law.

On February 8, the division bench had stayed the single-judge direction to FRL and various statutory authorities to maintain the status quo on the deal.

Amazon submitted in the top court that Biyanis of Future Group had negotiated with it to enter into certain agreements and emphasized that EA's award was enforceable. The e-commerce giant insisted FRL is bound by Singapore's EA award, which restrained it from going ahead with its merger deal with Reliance Retail.

The high court division bench passed an interim direction on FRL's appeal challenging the February 2 order of the single judge which had ruled in favour of the US firm. The single judge bench had said the EA's award was valid and enforceable.

The Future group, in August last year, had reached an agreement to sell its retail, wholesale, logistics, and warehousing units to Reliance.

Subsequently, Amazon took FRL into EA before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) over alleged breach of contract by the Future group and also filed a plea at the high court seeking enforcement of the October 25, 2020, EA award by SIAC restraining FRL from going ahead with the deal with Reliance Retail.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: amazonsingaporeNew DelhiSupreme CourtHarish SalveThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-west
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalReview Petitions Against Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Article 370 Abrogation Listed for Hearing On May 1st

NationalSunita Kejriwal, Atishi Meet Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal in Tihar Jail

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Why No Bail Plea in Trial Court, Supreme Court Asks CM Arvind Kejriwal

NationalSupreme Court Denies Request to Delay CA Exams Amid Lok Sabha Election 2024

National“Not a Single Rupee Was Traced Back to AAP”: CM Arvind Kejriwal Files Response on ED’s Affidavit in Supreme Court

International Realted Stories

InternationalAbu Dhabi Municipality marks World Day for Safety and Health at Work

InternationalSpain PM Pedro Sanchez to remain in office after threatening to resign

InternationalIsraeli attacks killed 27 in Rafah, alleges Hamas-run health authority

InternationalTaiwan tracks four Chinese naval vessels amid mounting tensions

InternationalIran rejects speculation about nuclear cooperation with North Korea