City
Epaper

Coorg arms licence exemption questioned, SC seeks Centre's response

By IANS | Updated: March 29, 2022 20:45 IST

New Delhi, March 29 The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought the Central government and others' response on a ...

Open in App

New Delhi, March 29 The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought the Central government and others' response on a plea challenging a notification, which permitted exemption to Jumma tenure holders and Kodava community from obtaining a licence to carry and possess firearms, under the Arms Act.

A plea had been filed by Capt Chetan Y.K. challenged the Karnataka High Court judgment upholding the validity of the exemption notification issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs on October 29, 2019. The notification read: "The arms or ammunition carried or possessed by any person being Coorg by race and every Jumma tenure holder in Coorg and herein exempted whilst residing or travelling outside the district of Coorg shall not exceed one rifle with 100 rounds of ammunition for the same and one smooth bore breech or muzzle loading gun with 500 cartridges or the equivalent in leaden shot and gunpowder."

A bench, headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana issued notice after hearing arguments.

The plea argued that the notification created discrimination based on caste and race and ancestral land tenure, which violated Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution. The plea contended that the locals, who have the same culture, but neither belonged to the Coorg community nor did they possess now defunct Jumma tenure holding of land, have not been granted any exemption.

It contended that the notification was issued under Section 41 of the Arms Act and any exemption under this Act can only be granted in public interest, while emphasising that the notification also violated Section 41.

The high court observed that Kodava community and Jumma tenure holders are enjoying the benefit of exemption since the pre-independence period, and they have rightly been granted exemption for a period of ten years, and not for an indefinite term.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Central GovernmentSupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

CricketSupreme Court Refuses to Cancel India vs Pakistan Match in Asia Cup 2025

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Surge Second Day In a Row After Telecom Company Approach SC Over AGR Dues

EntertainmentSamay Raina’s Mumbai Show: 25,000 Fans Attend Stand-Up Comedian’s Performance Months After India’s Got Talent Controversy

NationalSupreme Court Asks Comedians Samay Raina, Vipul Goyal, Balraj Ghai, Nishant Tanwar, and Sonali Thakkar To Apologize for Cracking Insensitive Jokes on Disabilities

National'Release of Sterilised Stray Dogs, Aggressive Ones to Remain in Cages': Supreme Court

National Realted Stories

NationalSchools and colleges to remain closed in Manipur today as rain trigger floods

NationalIAS officer Sarfaraz Ahmad appointed MD of Hyderabad Metro Rail

NationalBJP leaders reflect on PM Modi's enduring legacy on his 75th birthday

NationalChandrababu Naidu asks Collectors to focus on achieving 15 pc growth rate

NationalFormer TTD chairman alleges act of sacrilege in Tirupati