City
Epaper

CPI(M) leader moves SC for early hearing of petition challenging abrogation of Article 370

By ANI | Updated: August 28, 2021 13:50 IST

Senior CPI(M) leader MY Tarigami has approached the Supreme Court of India urging it for early hearing of his petition challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and bifurcation of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union territories.

Open in App

Senior CPI(M) leader MY Tarigami has approached the Supreme Court of India urging it for early hearing of his petition challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and bifurcation of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union territories.

Tarigami, who had challenged the abrogation and the Jammu and Kashmir (Reorganisation) Act, 2019 (The Reorganisation Act) as being unconstitutional, sought an early hearing of the case saying sweeping changes are being brought about by the Centre that impact the rights of a large number of people.

Tarigami said despite the fact that the petition is pending before the Supreme Court since 2019, the central government has taken some "irreversible actions".

He said the Centre has constituted a delimitation commission to mark boundaries in the territory for all the constituencies before an assembly election can be held.

The plea listing out the changes made by the Central government said it made amendment of the Jammu and Kashmir Development Act allowing persons who are not permanent residents buy land in Jammu and Kashmir if it is not agricultural land.

The plea said it has closed down institutions such as the J&K State Women's Commission, J&K State Accountability Commission, J&K State Consumer Protection Commission and J&K State Human Rights Commission.

The CPI(M) leader said his plea ought to be heard on an expedited basis otherwise the petition itself would be rendered infructuous in view of the irreversible actions of the government.

On August 5, 2019, the Central government announced its decision to revoke the special status of Jammu and Kashmir granted under Article 370 and split the region into two Union territories.

A five-judge Bench in March 2020 had declined to refer to a larger 7-judge bench a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Centre's decision to abrogate provisions of Article 370 on August 5 last year, saying there were no reasons to refer the matter to a larger bench.

A number of petitions have been filed in the top court including those of private individuals, lawyers, activists and politicians and political parties challenging the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which splits Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories -- Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtSupreme court of indiaSupreme court and high courtSupreme court and high court of delhiSpecial court of delhi
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiDevendra Fadnavis Disagrees with Abrupt Closure of Mumbai’s Kabutarkhanas, Urges Regulated Measures to Mitigate Health Risks

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

National Realted Stories

NationalK'taka govt to hold spl Cabinet meeting on Aug 16 over internal reservation matter

National‘India will not bow’: Farmers hail PM Modi’s firm message to US

NationalDelhi L-G inaugurates Mini Sports Complex in Sukhdev Vihar

NationalIndia is rightly defending its national interests: Prabhash Ranjan

NationalChhattisgarh: Youths being trained as beautician under RSETI initiative