City
Epaper

Delhi HC seeks Centre's response on plea against inviting objections to registration of inter-faith marriage

By ANI | Updated: October 7, 2020 12:45 IST

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the Central government's reply on a petition challenging the procedure of issuance of public notice for 30 days inviting objections to the inter-faith marriage being registered under the Special Marriage Act.

Open in App

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the Central government's reply on a petition challenging the procedure of issuance of public notice for 30 days inviting objections to the inter-faith marriage being registered under the Special Marriage Act.

A division bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan asked Centre and Delhi government to file a reply on the petition filed by an inter-faith couple and listed the matter for further hearing on November 27.

The petition, filed by advocates Utkarsh Singh, Md Tauheed and Mohd Humaid, sought to set aside the impugned procedure of issuance of public notice for 30 days inviting objections to the marriage as for solemnization and registration of marriages under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.

The inter-faith couple, in its plea, has sought directions to concerned authorities to register the marriage of the petitioners with immediate effect.

The petition sought to declare Sections 6 and 7 of the Special Marriage Act as null and void and ultra vires to the Constitution of India by holding it as illegal, null, void, ultra-vires and unconstitutional to the Constitution of India.

It also sought directions to respondents to decide the objections on the basis of undertaking and certificates issued by a government hospital or any other prescribed authority.

The petitioners submitted that they are directly affected and aggrieved by the impugned procedure for applying for registration of marriages under Sections 6 and 7 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 wherein public notice is issued inviting objections mentioned in section 4 of the SMA, 1954 to the marriage for next 30 days.

It submitted that objection under section 4(a) of the SMA, 1954 is based on a presumption and bias running against the inter-faith marriages and the same conditionality (neither party has a living spouse) can well arise in other religious marriages also but they are exempted from 30 days' notice period depriving petitioners of their life and liberty.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: SmartwatchUtkarsh singhMd tauheeddelhiindiaDelhi High CourtDelhi delhi high court`delhiDelhi capitalSouth delhi district administrationIndiUk-india
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDilli Haat Fire: Massive Blaze Erupts at Delhi's Popular Market, 26 Shops Gutted (Watch Video)

MumbaiMumbai: Gold Sales Cross ₹12,000 Crores Nationwide on Akshaya Tritiya; Mumbai MMR Sees ₹800 Crores Trade

NationalAkshaya Tritiya 2025: Gold Market Sees Huge Footfall Despite Price Hike (Watch Video)

National19-Year Old Dies After Allegedly Jumping from Police Van in Delhi; Family Alleges Custodial Death (Watch Video)

EntertainmentKaran Johar Responds to Groom Calling off Wedding After DJ plays Channa Mereya from Ae Dil Hai Mushkil, Says...

National Realted Stories

NationalTight security in Thiruvananthapuram ahead of PM Modi's visit today

NationalMaharashtra remains a strong pillar of progress: PM Modi

NationalHeavy security deployment for May 8 ‘Meenakshi Kalyanam’ in TN's Madurai

NationalInternational Labour Day 2025: Empowering Rural Youth Beyond Employment Numbers

NationalSalute unsung heroes who keep Adani Group running: Gautam Adani on Labour Day