City
Epaper

Delhi HC seeks Centre's response on plea against inviting objections to registration of inter-faith marriage

By ANI | Updated: October 7, 2020 12:45 IST

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the Central government's reply on a petition challenging the procedure of issuance of public notice for 30 days inviting objections to the inter-faith marriage being registered under the Special Marriage Act.

Open in App

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the Central government's reply on a petition challenging the procedure of issuance of public notice for 30 days inviting objections to the inter-faith marriage being registered under the Special Marriage Act.

A division bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan asked Centre and Delhi government to file a reply on the petition filed by an inter-faith couple and listed the matter for further hearing on November 27.

The petition, filed by advocates Utkarsh Singh, Md Tauheed and Mohd Humaid, sought to set aside the impugned procedure of issuance of public notice for 30 days inviting objections to the marriage as for solemnization and registration of marriages under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.

The inter-faith couple, in its plea, has sought directions to concerned authorities to register the marriage of the petitioners with immediate effect.

The petition sought to declare Sections 6 and 7 of the Special Marriage Act as null and void and ultra vires to the Constitution of India by holding it as illegal, null, void, ultra-vires and unconstitutional to the Constitution of India.

It also sought directions to respondents to decide the objections on the basis of undertaking and certificates issued by a government hospital or any other prescribed authority.

The petitioners submitted that they are directly affected and aggrieved by the impugned procedure for applying for registration of marriages under Sections 6 and 7 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 wherein public notice is issued inviting objections mentioned in section 4 of the SMA, 1954 to the marriage for next 30 days.

It submitted that objection under section 4(a) of the SMA, 1954 is based on a presumption and bias running against the inter-faith marriages and the same conditionality (neither party has a living spouse) can well arise in other religious marriages also but they are exempted from 30 days' notice period depriving petitioners of their life and liberty.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: SmartwatchUtkarsh singhMd tauheeddelhiindiaDelhi High CourtDelhi delhi high court`delhiDelhi capitalSouth delhi district administrationIndiUk-india
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessAnil Ambani Files Defamation Case Against Cobrapost Over Defamatory' Reporting

EntertainmentShehnaaz Gill Reacts to Delhi Red Fort Car Blast: “Praying for Peace and Strength to Everyone Affected”

NationalDelhi: Loud Explosion Heard Near Radisson Hotel in Mahipalpur, Nothing Suspicious Found

NationalDelhi Red Fort Car Blast: DNA Test Confirms Dr Umar Un Nabi Was Suicide Bomber Driving i20 Car; Planning to Attack Ayodhya

NationalDelhi Red Fort Blast: Union Cabinet Directs ‘Utmost Urgency’ in Hunting Down Terror Perpetrators

National Realted Stories

NationalSanatan philosophy is integral human philosophy: Mohan Bhagwat

NationalIndian Army conducts drill to assess battle readiness in Rajasthan's Thar desert

National'Global leader' PM Modi held in high regard for championing issues of Global South: SA envoy

NationalNCB seizes hydroponic ganja worth Rs 10 crore at Chennai airport, two women held

NationalPM Modi and President Ramaphosa set to bolster India-South Africa partnership during G20 Summit: Envoy