City
Epaper

HC adjourns to Nov 27 hearing on Delhi govt's plea against stay on reserving private hospitals beds for COVID

By ANI | Updated: October 9, 2020 16:30 IST

The Delhi High Court on Friday adjourned to November 27 hearing on a petition moved by the Delhi government challenging a stay on its order directing private hospitals to reserve 80 per cent ICU beds for COVID-19 patients.

Open in App

The Delhi High Court on Friday adjourned to November 27 hearing on a petition moved by the Delhi government challenging a stay on its order directing private hospitals to reserve 80 per cent ICU beds for COVID-19 patients.

A division bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan adjourned the hearing.

The Delhi government had filed a petition through additional standing counsel Sanjoy Ghose against a single-judge bench order dated September 22 staying the order for private hospitals to reserve 80 per cent ICU beds exclusively for COVID-19 patients.

It had submitted that the bench has not appreciated the categoric submissions made on behalf of the appellant regarding the surge in the number of COVID-19 patients, and the dynamic efforts being undertaken by the appellant to tackle the ever-changing nature of the situation regarding healthcare and medical facilities in the NCT of Delhi on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The single-judge bench had issued the interim stay on a petition filed by the Association of Healthcare Providers India through advocates Sanyam Khetarpal and Narita Yadav claiming that the Delhi government order was passed in an arbitrary, unfair and illegal manner without realising the difficulties that may be faced by private nursing homes and hospitals.

It also stated that the order has been issued without any prior discussions with private hospitals to understand the current demand-supply situation of critical care beds. The plea also stated that the order is exposing non-COVID-19 patients to the risk of COVID-19.

"Reserving 80 per cent ICU beds will deny urgent care to seriously ill patients, requiring vital surgical interventions and critical care. These beds, which may constitute 15 per cent to 20 per cent of overall ICU bed capacity in some of the hospitals, are not usable for COVID-19 patients since very rarely does a COVID-19 patient of that age requires critical care," the plea had said.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Association of healthcare providers indiaPrateek jalanSanjoy ghoseDelhi High CourtDelhi delhi high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalRCB Approaches Delhi High Court Against Uber Over Advertisement Featuring Travis Head

NationalSupreme Court Judges Unanimously Agreed To Declare Their Assets

NationalDelhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma Transfer to Allahabad HC Amid Cash Recovery Controversy

NationalHC Directs Centre to Decide on Renaming India to Bharat or Hindustan

Other SportsDelhi High Court Grants Bail To Olympic Medallist Sushil Kumar In Murder Case

National Realted Stories

NationalCPI-M wants India to continue pressure on Pakistan to hand over terrorists involved in Pahalgam massacre

NationalAkhilesh Yadav Reaffirms Samajwadi Party's Stand to Support Government in Action Against Terrorism

National'Operation Sindoor' a 'befitting response' to Pahalgam terror attack, says Tripura CM

NationalOp Sindoor: All steps taken to ensure civilian safety; teams deployed at key installations, says K'taka HM

NationalVIP Chief Sahani backs Operation Sindoor, calls it befitting reply to terrorism