City
Epaper

'India need not learn from Pakistan', Khurshid challenges BJP’s Waqf Board comparison

By IANS | Updated: August 9, 2024 21:35 IST

New Delhi, Aug 9 In response to a query during an interview with IANS on BJP's claim that ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 9 In response to a query during an interview with IANS on BJP's claim that the Waqf Board in India holds more powers than similar institutions in countries like Pakistan, Congress leader and former Union Minister Salman Khurshid said on Friday that Pakistan should view India as a model to learn from, rather than the other way around.

“Why are we talking about Pakistan? Should we learn everything from Pakistan? Pakistan should be learning from us! We should focus on what our elders considered right and did. Ultimately, the courts oversee everything, and a tribunal is also a type of court. If the government doesn’t trust the courts, it should say that openly instead of only trusting their Collectors,” Khurshid argued during his conversation with IANS.

Khurshid also emphasised the importance of discussing the key issues, such as the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, thoroughly before implementing any changes claimed to be for public good.

On the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, Khurshid noted that while it is preferable to voice opinions during the Joint Parliamentary Committee's review, he would still make some submissions on the matter due to its significance to the public.

“I believe the Parliament will carefully consider it. I want to highlight that there is a certain atmosphere in the country right now where it feels like efforts are being made to interfere with the institutions which are connected to minorities,” said Khurshid.

“Whether it is the discussion on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), madrasas, or any other issues related to minorities, such as scholarships from the Maulana Azad Foundation, many decisions are being made that indicates that the government wants to restrict the rights and institutions of minorities,” he claimed.

On AAP leader Manish Sisodia being granted bail by the Supreme Court, the former Union Minister said, “The court grants bail after careful consideration. If the court granted bail after 17 months, it must have deemed that 17 months are more than enough. If the trial hasn’t progressed in such a long time, more time will just pass; it is the responsibility of the prosecution to expedite the case.”

“As far as I understand, the court stated that the delay in this case was not Manish Sisodia’s fault, which is why he was granted bail. This bail doesn’t indicate that the charges against him were either correct or incorrect. Bail was granted so the case could proceed and evidence could be presented,” he added.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalAt least 16 Epstein files removed from US Department of Justice website

EntertainmentAjay Devgn, Rajkummar Rao, Neil Nitin Mukesh attend Anand Pandit's birthday bash in style

AurangabadStepping Stones Jungle Book comes to life

EntertainmentSupernatural comedy Anime 'Dan Da Dan' Season 3 to air in 2027

AurangabadBlind women cricketers’ World Cup triumph celebrated; From impossible to possible: Indian eves achieve extraordinary feat

National Realted Stories

NationalBihar: Bagaha's Suman Devi scripts success story of self-reliance, earns lakhs through beekeeping

National'Nation first must guide thought and action', Arunachal Guv tells NCC cadets

NationalTurn Yoga and meditation into a mass movement for a healthy, balanced society: Gujarat CM

NationalKCR announces mass movement over irrigation projects

NationalChains of Commerce: How Britain’s need for gold forced ‘circuitous route’ that crushed India’s trade (From the Archives)