Kochi, Aug 1 The Kerala High Court has held that the multiplier method must be applied while calculating the compensation in motor accident claim cases in serious injuries as well and not just in cases of deaths.
Thecourt emphasized that the purpose of adopting the multiplier method was to achieve uniformity and consistency while assessing compensation in motor vehicle accidents, regardless of the nature of injury.
“The very purpose of adopting the multiplier method in Sarla Verma (supra) is to do away with the considerable variation and inconsistency in assessing compensation and also to bring uniformity and consistency," noted thehighcourtsaid.
"If this be the logic for adopting the multiplier method, can any change in the legal position be conceded for the reason that the result of the accident is an injury -- especially in cases of serious injuries as available in the present case -- instead of a death? The answer to the above question is surely negative, in the estimation of this court, having regard to the logic and purpose behind adopting the multiplier method," thecourtpointed out.
Thehighcourtmade the observation while dealing with two appeals filed against a verdict of a Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (MACT) in a case where an insurance claimant had been granted about Rs 5.4 lakhs as compensation for injuries suffered after his scooter collided with a bus.
The MACT had calculated the compensation using thesplit multipliermethod, and not the multiplier method.
Thesplit multipliermethod involves using one multiplier up to the date of retirement and another multiplier for the period after retirement.
Thehighcourtnoted that in various cases, the multiplier method was used where accidents have resulted in deaths. However, thecourthas now opined that themultipliercan be applied to serious injuries as well.
After examining the merits of the case, the highcourtproceeded to enhance the compensation payable to the claimant under the heads of loss of amenities, pain and suffering and extra nourishment, while applying the multiplier method.
As a result, the compensation payable was enhanced to about Rs 7.6 lakhs.
Thehighcourtpartly allowed the claimant’s appeal in these terms and dismissed the insurance company’s appeal.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor