City
Epaper

Obligatory for woman to serve her elderly mother-in-law: Jharkhand HC

By IANS | Updated: January 25, 2024 02:15 IST

Ranchi, Jan 25 The Jharkhand High Court has observed that in Indian culture, it is an obligation for ...

Open in App

Ranchi, Jan 25 The Jharkhand High Court has observed that in Indian culture, it is an obligation for a married woman to serve her elderly mother-in-law or grandmother-in-law.

A woman cannot put pressure on her husband to stay away from his mother and grandmother without reasonable cause, the High Court said giving its verdict in a family dispute case.

Justice Subhash Chand was hearing a plea by one Rudra Narayan Rai against an order by a family court, which directed him to pay a sum of Rs 30,000 per month to his wife and Rs 15,000 to his son.

The High Court held that the woman was not entitled to maintenance as she refused to live with her husband without reasonable cause. However, it increased the son's maintenance allowance from Rs 15,000 to Rs 25,000.

The court referred to the fundamental duties mentioned under Article 51-A in the Constitution and the mythological texts Yajurveda and Manusmriti.

Referring to Article 51-A, the Judge said it is a fundamental duty of a citizen "to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture".

"It is the culture in India to serve the old aged mother-in-law or grandmother-in-law, as the case may be, by the wife, in order to preserve this culture," the court said.

Quoting a verse from Manusmriti, the court said: "A family where women remain unhappy... is bound to be destroyed. And a family where women are always happy is bound to prosper forever..."

Rudra Narayan Rai's wife Piyali Rai Chatterjee had alleged that her husband and in-laws were cruel to her and tortured her for dowry.

On the other hand, Rudra Narayan Rai said that his wife pressured him to stay away from his mother and grandmother.

He told the court that the wife often quarrelled with the two old women of the house and kept going to her parent's house without informing him.

After hearing both parties, the High Court said that the evidence on record indicated that the wife was pressurizing the husband to live separately from his mother and grandmother without any valid reason.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentUrvashi Dholakia shares how Komolika let her explore performance shades actors only dream of

BusinessPride India Awards Special Edition 2025 Indian Icon of Real Estate Excellence - NBR Group:From Foundations to Futures, Introducing NBR Soul of the Seasons

BusinessHettich Strengthens its Experiential Touchpoints in South India with the Launch of its Exclusive Store in Coimbatore

BusinessIndia PR Distribution expands its media network through new digital Press Release partnerships

BusinessFinal Opportunity to Apply for SCIT's MBA Programmes in ITBM & Data Sciences

National Realted Stories

NationalKerala court orders return of actor Dileep's passport

National'Be alive to ground realities': SC refuse to entertain PIL challenged bottled water standards

NationalMessi event chaos: Bengal DGP among three top officials submit replies to show-cause notices

NationalVijay calls DMK 'destructive power’ at Erode rally, says TVK force of purity

NationalInside the ISI playbook: Jamaat, NCP, and the plan to rig the Bangladesh elections