City
Epaper

Police can't seize property during investigation: SC

By IANS | Published: September 24, 2019 6:48 PM

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that police has no power to seize immovable property during an investigation.

Open in App

Upholding the Bombay High Court order, the apex court, however, made it clear that its ruling would not bar or prohibit the police officer from seizing documents and papers of title relating to immovable property, as it is distinct and different from seizure of immovable property.

A bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna had heard the matter relating to powers of the police under section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) in respect of seizure of property during investigation.

The court was hearing Maharashtra government plea challenging a Bombay High Court order which held that the police has no power to seize property during the course of an ongoing probe.

The ruling was announced by the bench of Justices Gupta and Khanna.

"Section 102 of the Code is not a general provision which enables and authorises the police officer to seize immovable property for being able to be produced in the criminal court during trial," the court said in its order.

As per the order copy, disputes and matters relating to the physical and legal possession and title of the property would be adjudicated upon by a civil court.

The court noted that it will not be proper to hold that Section 102 of the CrPC empowers a police officer to seize immovable property, land, plots, residential houses, streets or similar properties.

Given the nature of criminal litigation, such seizure of an immovable property by the police officer in the form of an attachment and dispossession would not facilitate investigation to collect evidence and material to be produced during inquiry and trial, it said.

"As far as possession of the immovable property is concerned, specific provisions in the form of Sections 145 and 146 of the Code can be invoked as per and in accordance with law," the court said.

The court also held that the power of a police officer under Section 102 of the Code to seize any property, which may be found under circumstances that create suspicion of the commission of any offence, would not include the power to attach, seize and seal immovable property.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Deepak GuptaSanjiv KhannaBombay High CourtRanjan GogoiIans
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraMaratha Reservation Row: OBC Welfare Foundation Moves HC Against Kunbi Certificates Given to Maratha Community

MaharashtraMumbai: HC Orders Railway Ministry to Deposit Rs 3.9 Crore Within a Month or Face Confiscation of Churchgate Building

MaharashtraBombay High Court Directs Maharashtra Government to Complete Aarey Colony Road Reconstruction within Two Years, Emphasizes Wildlife Safety

EntertainmentRakhi Sawant Withdraws Her Supreme Court Appeal Against Bombay High Court's Anticipatory Bail Orders in Adil Durrani Case

MaharashtraDawoodi Bohra Succession Plea: Bombay High Court Rules in Favour of Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin

National Realted Stories

NationalPM Modi to address rally in Bihar's Darbhanga today

NationalBJP seeks Rahul Gandhi's apology over Rohith Vemula case, accuses him of politicising the issue

NationalSharad Pawar: Hope Uddhav Thackeray never needs PM Modi’s help

NationalNCPCR asks all states to prevent illegal transportation of children

NationalKolkata: Fire Breaks Out at Garment Factory in Dashadrone, No Casualties Reported (Watch Video)